Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31793648›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2019

Closing the Nutrition Impact Gap Using Program Impact Pathway Analyses to Inform the Need for Program Modifications in Mexico's Conditional Cash Transfer Program.

Armando García-Guerra, Lynnette M Neufeld, Anabelle Bonvecchio Arenas, Ana C Fernández-Gaxiola, Fabiola Mejía-Rodríguez, Raquel García-Feregrino, Juan A Rivera-Dommarco

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Armando García-GuerraInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública México (INSP), Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Lynnette M NeufeldGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Anabelle Bonvecchio ArenasInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública México (INSP), Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Ana C Fernández-GaxiolaInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública México (INSP), Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Fabiola Mejía-RodríguezInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública México (INSP), Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Raquel García-FeregrinoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública México (INSP), Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Juan A Rivera-DommarcoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública México (INSP), Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMexico's Prospera-Oportunidades-Progresa Conditional Cash Transfer Program (CCT-POP) included the distribution of fortified food supplements (FFS) for pregnant and lactating women and young children. Rigorous evaluations showed significant impacts on nutrition outcomes but also substantial gaps in addressing nutrition problems.

objectivesTo highlight the program design-related and implementation-related gaps and challenges that motivated further research and the eventual design and roll-out of a modified nutrition component for CCT-POP.

methodsWe used a program impact pathway approach to highlight the extent and quality of implementation of CCT-POP, and its impact on nutrition outcomes. We drew on previously published and new primary data, organized into 3 sources: impact evaluations, studies to inform reformulation of the FFS, and a longitudinal follow-up study using qualitative and quantitative methods to document FFS use and the dietary intake of women and children.

resultsDespite positive impacts, a high prevalence of malnutrition persisted in the population. Coverage and use of health services improved, but quality of care was lacking. Consumption of FFS among lactating women was irregular. Micronutrient intake improved among children who consumed FFS, but the pattern of use limited frequency and quantity consumed. Substantial diversity in the prevalence of undernutrition was documented, as was an increased risk of overweight and obesity among women.

conclusionsThree key design and implementation challenges were identified. FFS, although well accepted for children, had limited potential to substantially modify the quality of children's diets because of the pattern of use in the home. The communications strategy was ineffective and ill-suited to its objective of motivating FFS use. Finally, the program with its common design across all regions of Mexico was not well adapted to the special needs of some subgroups, particularly indigenous populations. The studies reviewed in this paper motivated additional research and the eventual redesign of the nutrition component.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedMotivationChildChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietFemaleHumansLactationMalnutritionMexicoMicronutrientsPregnancyResearch DesignSocial WelfareMicronutrientsdietary intakefortified food supplementsinfant and young childpregnant and lactating womenprogram impactprogram impact pathway

Identifiers

PMID31793648
PMCPMC6887996
OpenAlexW2994009956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.