Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31793646›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2019

A Brief History of Evidence-Informed Decision Making for Nutrition in Mexico.

Lynnette M Neufeld, Rogelio Grados, Alejandría Villa de la Vega, Concepción Steta, Ferdinando Regalia, Juan A Rivera-Dommarco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lynnette M NeufeldGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rogelio GradosNational Coordination of the Prospera Program of Social Inclusion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandría Villa de la VegaNational Commission for Social Protection in Health, Secretary of Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Concepción StetaDepartment of Social Protection and Jobs, Latin America and Caribbean, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Ferdinando RegaliaSocial Protection and Health Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Juan A Rivera-DommarcoNational Institute of Public Health of Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Progresa Conditional Cash Transfer program in Mexico began in 1997, with a strong evidence-based design. The program's ultimate objective was to foster the development of human capital through 3 components-education, health, and food. Rigorous impact evaluation generated evidence of impact on several outcomes, including child growth, but also aspects of program design and implementation challenges that may have limited impact. The objective of this supplement is to present research that led to the redesign of the health component, its implementation and evaluation at pilot scale, and its scale-up to national level, representing >15 y of collaboration among evaluators, program implementers, and funders. The studies used various methodologies, including process evaluation, cohort studies, ethnographic assessments, and a cluster-randomized trial, among others. The articles report previously unpublished results and citations of published literature. Article 1 uses an impact pathway to highlight gaps and bottlenecks that limited potential for greater impact, the original recognition of which was the impetus for this long collaboration. Article 2 explores the social and cultural factors that influence decisions to participate in programs and to adopt the actions proposed by them. Article 3 presents a cluster-randomized trial implemented to inform the choice of nutritional supplements for pregnant and lactating women and children 6-59 mo of age and how this and other evidence from the studies were used to redesign the health component of the program. Articles 4 and 5 present results of the development and pilot testing of the modified health component, the Integrated Strategy for Attention to Nutrition (abbreviated to EsIAN from its name in Spanish) (article 4), and the process and challenges of training and supervision in taking the EsIAN to scale (article 5). The final article provides reflections on the relevance of this body of work for implementation research in nutrition.

Indexed as

Decision Making, OrganizationalDietary SupplementsProgram EvaluationDiet, HealthyHumansMexicoimpact evaluationimplementation researchprocess evaluationprogram improvementsocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID31793646
PMCPMC6887934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.