Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31793434›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Analysis of stochastic fluctuations in responsiveness is a critical step toward personalized anesthesia.

Andrew R McKinstry-Wu, Andrzej Z Wasilczuk, Benjamin A Harrison, Victoria M Bedell, Mathangi J Sridharan, Jayce J Breig, Michael Pack, Max B Kelz, Alexander Proekt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Uncoupling immobility and unconsciousness.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Hormonal basis of sex differences in anesthetic sensitivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew R McKinstry-Wu *Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Andrzej Z Wasilczuk *Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1492-2319
Benjamin A HarrisonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Victoria M BedellDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Mathangi J SridharanCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States.
Jayce J BreigDepartment of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States.
Michael PackDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Max B KelzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Alexander ProektDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9272-5337

Funding

NEURONAL BASIS UNDERLYING VOLATILE ANESTHETIC INDUCED HYPNOSISR01GM088156 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KELZ, MAX · 2010 to 2021
$3.8M
Physician Postdoctoral Research Training in Perioperative Medicine (PPRTPM)T32GM112596 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Roderic G Eckenhoff, Max Kelz · 2015 to 2026
$3.4M
Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Recovery of ConsciousnessR01GM124023 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PROEKT, ALEXANDER · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
OptoanesthesiaR01GM107117 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KELZ, MAX · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
Intersections of Sleep and Coma: Neural Pathways of Alpha-2 Adrenergic HypnosisK08GM123317 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKINSTRY-WU, ANDREW RICH · 2017 to 2021
$877k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM123317NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088156NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM112596NIH HHS K08 GM123317NIH HHS R01 GM088156NIH HHS R01 GM107117NIH HHS R01 GM124023NIH HHS T32 GM112596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, drug dosing is based on a concentration-response relationship estimated in a population. Yet, in specific individuals, decisions based on the population-level effects frequently result in over or under-dosing. Here, we interrogate the relationship between population-based and individual-based responses to anesthetics in mice and zebrafish. The anesthetic state was assessed by quantifying responses to simple stimuli. Individual responses dynamically fluctuated at a fixed drug concentration. These fluctuations exhibited resistance to state transitions. Drug sensitivity varied dramatically across individuals in both species. The amount of noise driving transitions between states, in contrast, was highly conserved in vertebrates separated by 400 million years of evolution. Individual differences in anesthetic sensitivity and stochastic fluctuations in responsiveness complicate the ability to appropriately dose anesthetics to each individual. Identifying the biological substrate of noise, however, may spur novel therapies, assure consistent drug responses, and encourage the shift from population-based to personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugIndividualityAnesthesiaAnestheticsAnimalsComputer SimulationMiceModels, BiologicalPrecision MedicineStochastic ProcessesZebrafishAnestheticsanesthesiaindividual differencesmouseneurosciencepersonalized medicinephysics of living systemsstate transitionsstochastic fluctuationszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31793434
PMCPMC6890463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.