Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31793131›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2020

Brain morphological and functional features in cognitive subgroups of schizophrenia.

Yuka Yasuda, Naohiro Okada, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Masaki Fukunaga, Hidenaga Yamamori, Kazutaka Ohi, Daisuke Koshiyama, Noriko Kudo, Tomoko Shiino, Susumu Morita and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yuka YasudaLife Grow Brilliant Mental Clinic, Medical Corporation Foster, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2746-1590
Naohiro OkadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-2758
Kiyotaka NemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-9829
Masaki FukunagaDivision of Cerebral Integration, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Hidenaga YamamoriDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazutaka OhiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Daisuke KoshiyamaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko KudoDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko ShiinoDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Susumu MoritaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro MoritaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotsugu AzechiDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Michiko FujimotoDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichiro MiuraDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki WatanabeDepartment of Future Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyoto KasaiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryota HashimotoDepartment of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-4238

Funding

Brain/MINDS JP18dm0207006Brain/MINDS JP19dm0207069Grants-in-Aid for Scientific ResearchHealth and Labor Sciences Research GrantsInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPrevious studies have reported different brain morphologies in different cognitive subgroups of patients with schizophrenia. We aimed to examine the brain structures and functional connectivity in these cognitive subgroups of schizophrenia.

methodsWe compared brain structures among healthy controls and cognitively deteriorated and preserved subgroups of patients with schizophrenia according to the decline in IQ. Connectivity analyses between subcortical regions and other brain areas were performed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging among the groups.

resultsWhole brain and total cortical gray matter, right fusiform gyrus, left pars orbitalis gyrus, right pars triangularis, left superior temporal gyrus and left insula volumes, and bilateral cortical thickness were decreased in the deteriorated group compared to the control and preserved groups. Both schizophrenia subgroups had increased left lateral ventricle, right putamen and left pallidum, and decreased bilateral hippocampus, left precentral gyrus, right rostral middle frontal gyrus, and bilateral superior frontal gyrus volumes compared with controls. Hyperconnectivity between the thalamus and a broad range of brain regions was observed in the deteriorated group compared to connectivity in the control group, and this hyperconnectivity was less evident in the preserved group. We also found hyperconnectivity between the accumbens and the superior and middle frontal gyri in the preserved group compared with connectivity in the deteriorated group.

conclusionThese findings provide evidence of prominent structural and functional brain abnormalities in deteriorated patients with schizophrenia, suggesting that cognitive subgroups in schizophrenia might be useful biotypes to elucidate brain pathophysiology for new diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexCognitive DysfunctionConnectomeCorpus StriatumGray MatterSchizophreniaAdultFemaleHippocampusHumansIntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbrain functional connectivitybrain morphologycognitive declinecognitive subgroupschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31793131
PMCPMC7065166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.