Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792941›Full record

ReviewAnaesthesia2020

An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on fasting before procedural sedation in adults and children.

S M Green, P L Leroy, M G Roback, M G Irwin, G Andolfatto, F E Babl, E Barbi, L R Costa, A Absalom, D W Carlson and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fasting Guidelines for Invasive Cardiac Procedures: Let Them Eat Cake!Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effective and safe pediatric sedation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

S M GreenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
P L LeroyDepartment of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M G RobackUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
M G IrwinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
G AndolfattoUniversity of British, Columbia Department of Emergency Medicine, Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, BC, Canada.
F E BablDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
E BarbiDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.
L R CostaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania-Goias, Brazil.
A AbsalomDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands.
D W CarlsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
B S KraussDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J RoelofseDepartments of Anaesthesia, University of the Western Cape, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Republic of South Africa.
V M YuenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hong Kong Children's Hospital and Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
E AlcainoDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Sydney, Westmead Centre for Oral Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
P S CostaDepartment of Pediatrics, Federal University of Goias, Goiania-Goias, Brazil.
K P MasonDepartment of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation

Funding

Brazilian National Research Scientific Research CouncilConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)e Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG)National Health and Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multidisciplinary International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation presents the first fasting and aspiration prevention recommendations specific to procedural sedation, based on an extensive review of the literature. These were developed using Delphi methodology and assessment of the robustness of the available evidence. The literature evidence is clear that fasting, as currently practiced, often substantially exceeds recommended time thresholds and has known adverse consequences, for example, irritability, dehydration and hypoglycaemia. Fasting does not guarantee an empty stomach, and there is no observed association between aspiration and compliance with common fasting guidelines. The probability of clinically important aspiration during procedural sedation is negligible. In the post-1984 literature there are no published reports of aspiration-associated mortality in children, no reports of death in healthy adults (ASA physical status 1 or 2) and just nine reported deaths in adults of ASA physical status 3 or above. Current concerns about aspiration are out of proportion to the actual risk. Given the lower observed frequency of aspiration and mortality than during general anaesthesia, and the theoretical basis for assuming a lesser risk, fasting strategies in procedural sedation can reasonably be less restrictive. We present a consensus-derived algorithm in which each patient is first risk-stratified during their pre-sedation assessment, using evidence-based factors relating to patient characteristics, comorbidities, the nature of the procedure and the nature of the anticipated sedation technique. Graded fasting precautions for liquids and solids are then recommended for elective procedures based upon this categorisation of negligible, mild or moderate aspiration risk. This consensus statement can serve as a resource to practitioners and policymakers who perform and oversee procedural sedation in patients of all ages, worldwide.

Indexed as

FastingAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolConsensusDelphi TechniqueGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProcedural SedationRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentsfastingNPO guidelinesprocedural sedationpulmonary aspiration

Identifiers

PMID31792941
PMCPMC7064977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.