Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792903›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk surgical patients: is percutaneous cholecystostomy preferable to emergency cholecystectomy?

Marina Garcés-Albir, Víctor Martín-Gorgojo, Raúl Perdomo, José Luis Molina-Rodríguez, Elena Muñoz-Forner, Dimitri Dorcaratto, Joaquín Ortega, Luis Sabater

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy of blood parameters as indicators of the need for overdue urgent cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Article
  6. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis-comparative analysis of before and after the COVID 19 pandemic.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS. SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, OR ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT? BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY POSITION PAPER.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Patterns of prevalence and contemporary clinical management strategies in complicated acute biliary calculous disease: an ESTES 'snapshot audit' of practice.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina Garcés-AlbirLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Valencia. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain. garalma@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9474-6521
Víctor Martín-GorgojoLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Valencia. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Raúl PerdomoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Maciel, 11000, Montevideo, Uruguay.
José Luis Molina-RodríguezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General of Ontinyent, 46870, Ontinyent, Spain.
Elena Muñoz-FornerLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Valencia. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Dimitri DorcarattoLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Valencia. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Joaquín OrtegaLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Valencia. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Luis SabaterLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Valencia. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de València · ESHospital Maciel · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) has better results than emergency cholecystectomy (EC) in elderly and high-risk surgical patients.

methodsPatients ≥ 70 years and/or ≥ ASA-PS 3 with ACC treated with PC or EC between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Both techniques were compared regarding morbi-mortality, hospital stay, complications and readmissions. A subgroup analysis in higher risk patients (≥ 70 years plus ≥ ASA-PS 3) was also performed. A binary logistic regression analysis for outcome variables to calculate the OR was carried out.

resultsA total of 461 patients were included in the study. The results of PC were worse compared to EC: 30-day mortality (8.6 vs. 1.7%, OR 18.4), 90-day mortality (10.4 vs. 2.1%, OR 10.3), length of stay (days) (13.21 ± 8.2 vs. 7.48 ± 7.67, OR 8.7) and readmission rate (35.1 vs. 12.6%, OR 4.7). Complications were lower for PC (14 vs. 22.6%, OR 0.41), but there were no significant differences in the number of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III). Higher-risk subgroup analysis (n = 193; PC = 128, EC = 65) showed similar results to the whole series. Patients with ACC for more than 3 days had more risk of severe complications in both groups (OR 2.26; OR 2.76).

conclusionPC was associated with an increased risk of mortality at 30 and 90 days, more readmissions and longer hospital stay. Although PC presents a lower risk of complications, the percentage of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) does not show significant differences.

Indexed as

Cholecystitis, AcuteCholecystostomyAgedCholecystectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCholecystectomyCholecystitis, acuteCholecystostomy

Identifiers

PMID31792903
OpenAlexW2992665957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.