Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792896›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2020

On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion.

Silverio Rotondi, Natalia De Martini, Lida Tartaglione, Maria Luisa Muci, Vincenzo Petrozza, Natale Porta, Martina Leopizzi, Ilaria Proietti, Concetta Potenza, Nevena Skroza and 1 more

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silverio RotondiDialysis Unit at ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Natalia De MartiniDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Nephrology Unit at Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 153, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Lida TartaglioneDialysis Unit at ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Maria Luisa MuciDialysis Unit at ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Vincenzo PetrozzaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Pathology Unit, ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Natale PortaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Pathology Unit, ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Martina LeopizziDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Pathology Unit, ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Ilaria ProiettiDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Daniele Innocenzi" Dermatological Unit, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Concetta PotenzaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Daniele Innocenzi" Dermatological Unit, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Nevena SkrozaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Daniele Innocenzi" Dermatological Unit, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sandro MazzaferroDialysis Unit at ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy. sandro.mazzaferro@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3071-1893
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations are subtle, while overt necrotic ulcers may quickly spread and become infected so as to result in ominous outcome. Diagnosis might not be easy due to the number of other ischemic and non-ischemic skin lesions observed in uraemia. Skin biopsy, has been proposed as the diagnostic test and is often considered, but not systematically performed due to the hypothetical risk of further spreading of the lesions. Such ambiguity could be responsible for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. We review here five consecutive cases recorded in our Unit, all submitted to skin biopsy but with inconsistent results which generated some clinical frustration. Thus, we decided to carefully re-evaluate all of them together with pathologists and dermatologists. However, even after this ex-post discussion, we could not reach a complete agreement on the final diagnosis. In the meanwhile, papers were published in the literature that started to shed some light on the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of CUA.

Indexed as

CalciphylaxisKidney Failure, ChronicUremiaBiopsyHumansSkin

Identifiers

PMID31792896
OpenAlexW2989672525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.