Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792889›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2019

Needle-free connectors catheter-related bloodstream infections: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Michael Koeppen, Franziska Weinert, Sabrina Oehlschlaeger, Andreas Koerner, Peter Rosenberger, Helene Anna Haeberle

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02134769 (Incidence of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections Using Bionecteur Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02134769 nacompletednot on this map

Incidence of Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections Using Bionecteur Device

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2014 to 2015Enrolled221ConditionsInfectionArmsBionecteur
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael KoeppenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. michael.koeppen@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-1286
Franziska WeinertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Böblingen, Germany.
Sabrina OehlschlaegerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas KoernerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter RosenbergerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Helene Anna HaeberleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the critically ill, catheter-related bloodstream infection can result from bacterial contamination of infusion hubs of intravascular catheters. Needle-free connectors (NFC) have been suggested to reduce the rate of bacterial contamination and subsequent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), but data remains ambiguous. Thus, we tested if a novel NFC would reduce bacterial contamination and subsequent CRBSI.

resultsIn a prospective, randomized controlled trial, surgical ICU patients were randomized to three-way hubs closed by caps or Bionecteur® (Vygon, Inc.) of central venous catheters. Every 72 h, infusion lines were renewed and microbiological samples were taken. Bacterial growth was analyzed by blinded microbiologists. Incidence of bacterial contamination and CRSBI were assessed. Outcome parameters like length of stay on ICU and outcome were retrospectively assessed. Two thousand seven hundred patients were screened, 111 were randomized to the NFC, and 109 into the control group. Finally, 24 patients in the NFC and 23 control patients were analyzed. The majority of samples (NFC 77%; control 70%) found no bacterial growth. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were most commonly detected on CVC samples (NFC 17%; control 21%). We found CRBSI (defined as identical pathogens in blood culture and catheter line tip culture, and clinical manifestations of infection) in two control patients and one patient of the NFC group. Their length of ICU stay did not differ between groups (NFC 19 days; control 23 days).

conclusionThe use of NFC does not influence the rate of bacterial contamination of infusion hubs of central venous catheters.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02134769. Registered 09 May 2014.

Indexed as

Bionecteur®Catheter-related bloodstream infectionsNeedle-free connectors

Identifiers

PMID31792889
PMCPMC6888779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.