Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792860›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Association between Opioid Prescribing in Medicare and Pharmaceutical Company Gifts by Physician Specialty.

Mara A G Hollander, Julie M Donohue, Bradley D Stein, Elizabeth E Krans, Marian P Jarlenski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mara A G HollanderDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, A663 Crabtree Hall, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. mhollander@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-7431
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, A663 Crabtree Hall, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Bradley D SteinRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Elizabeth E KransDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Marian P JarlenskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, A663 Crabtree Hall, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USRAND Corporation · US

Funding

Availability, accessibility, and structure of opioid use disorder treatment and maternal and child health outcomesR01DA045675 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JARLENSKI, MARIAN PATRICIA, KRANS, ELIZABETH E · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between pharmaceutical industry promotion and physician opioid prescribing is poorly understood. Whether the influence of industry gifts on prescribing varies by specialty is unknown.

objectiveTo examine the relationship between opioid-related gifts to physicians and opioid prescribing in the subsequent year across 7 physician specialties.

designPanel study using data from 2014 to 2016.

participants236,103 unique Medicare Part D physicians (389,622 physician-years) who received any gifts from pharmaceutical companies measured using Open Payments and prescribed opioids in the subsequent year. MAIN MEASURES: Amounts paid by pharmaceutical companies for opioid-related gifts including meals and lodging; quartile of opioid prescribing as a percent of total prescribing compared with other same-specialty physicians. KEY

resultsIn 2014-2015, 14.1% of physician received opioid-related gifts from the industry with 2.6% receiving > $100. Gifts varied by specialty and were concentrated among two pharmaceutical companies responsible for 60% of the value of opioid-related gifts. Receiving opioid-related gifts was associated with greater prescribing of opioids compared with same-specialty physicians in the next year. Primary care physicians are nearly 3.5 times as likely to be in the highest quartile of prescribing versus the lower quartiles if they were paid ≥ $100. Psychiatrists and neurologists were 7 to 13 times as likely to be in a higher quartile of opioid prescribing compared with colleagues who were paid $0 in the preceding year.

conclusionsThe value of opioid-related gifts given to physicians varies substantially by provider specialty, as does the relationship between payment amounts and prescriber behavior in the following year.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsPhysiciansAgedAnalgesics, OpioidDrug IndustryGift GivingHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesAnalgesics, OpioidPharmaceutical Preparationsgiftsopioidsprescribing

Identifiers

PMID31792860
PMCPMC7403285
OpenAlexW2990167158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.