Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792800›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020

Validity of a low-cost Lichtenstein open inguinal hernia repair simulation model for surgical training.

T Nazari, M P Simons, M H Zeb, J J G van Merriënboer, J F Lange, T Wiggers, D R Farley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The SWIFTSS hernia model: putting ultra-low-cost hernia simulation in everybody's hands.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of a Modular and Equitable Surgical Simulator.Global health, science and practice · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T NazariDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. t.nazari@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0350-412X
M P SimonsDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M H ZebDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J J G van MerriënboerDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5868-7031
J F LangeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
T WiggersIncision Academy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D R FarleyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSimulation training allows trainees to gain experience in a safe environment. Computer simulation and animal models to practice a Lichtenstein open inguinal hernia repair (LOIHR) are available; however, a low-cost model is not. We constructed an inexpensive model using fabric, felt, and yarn that simulates the anatomy and hazards of the LOIHR. This study examined the fidelity, and perceived usefulness of our developed simulation model by surgical residents and expert surgeons.

methodsA total of 66 Dutch surgical residents and ten international expert surgeons were included. All participants viewed a video-demonstration of LOIHR on the simulation model and subsequently performed the surgery themselves on the model. Afterward, they assessed the model by rating 13 statements concerning its fidelity (six model, three equipment, and four psychological) and six usefulness statements on a five-point Likert scale. One-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare to the neutral value of 3.

resultsThe fidelity was assessed as being high by residents [model 4.00 (3.00-4.00), equipment 4.00 (3.00-4.00), psychological 4.00 (3.00-4.00); all p's < 0.001] and by expert surgeons [model 4.00 (3.00-4.00), p = 0.025; equipment 4.00 (3.00-5.00), p < 0.001; psychological 4.00 (3.00-4.00), p = 0.053]. The usefulness was rated high by residents and experts, especially the usefulness for training of residents [residents 4.00 (4.00-5.00), p < 0.001; experts 4.50 (3.75-5.00), p = 0.015].

conclusionOur developed Lichtenstein open inguinal hernia repair simulation model was assessed by surgical residents and expert surgeons as a model with high fidelity and high potential usefulness, especially for the training of surgical residents.

Indexed as

AdultComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyLiechtensteinOpen inguinal hernia repairSimulation modelSurgical education

Identifiers

PMID31792800
PMCPMC7395906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.