Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792794›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Towards sustainable system configuration for the treatment of fish processing wastewater using bioreactors.

Mahesh Mannacharaju, Arivizhivendhan Kannan Villalan, Buvaneswari Shenbagam, Patchai Murugan Karmegam, Prabhakaran Natarajan, Swarnalatha Somasundaram, Gnanamani Arumugam, Sekaran Ganesan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahesh MannacharajuEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Arivizhivendhan Kannan VillalanEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Buvaneswari ShenbagamEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Patchai Murugan KarmegamEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Prabhakaran NatarajanEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Swarnalatha SomasundaramEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Gnanamani ArumugamDepartment of Microbiology (Biological Material Laboratory), CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India.
Sekaran GanesanEnvironmental Science and Engineering Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI), Adyar, Chennai-600020, India. sekaransabari@gmail.com.
Central Leather Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wastewater generated from fish processing industry contains a credible level of biodegradable proteins and low biodegradable fats, oils, and grease (FOG). The conventional biological treatment of fish processing wastewater (FPWW) containing high concentration of FOG faces the challenges of clogging, hindrance to sedimentation due to the formation of hydrophobic sludge along with lipids, flocculation of sludge with poor activity, dewatering of sludge due to the presence of lipids, and formation of aminated offensive odors. The present investigation employed baffled moving bed biofilm reactor (BMBBR), up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, fluidized immobilized cell carbon oxidation (FICCO) reactor, and chemoautotrophic activated carbon oxidation (CAACO) reactors in series to treat FPWW. Five treatment options were evaluated to elevate the correct option for the treatment of FPWW. The treatment option V had established the removal efficiency of COD, 99 ± 0.1%; protein, 99 ± 0.2%; lipids, 100%; and oil and grease, 100%.

Indexed as

BioreactorsFood HandlingAnaerobiosisAnimalsBiofilmsFishesOilsSeafoodSewageWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterOilsSewageWastewaterBiological processFat, oil, and greaseFish processing industryPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID31792794
OpenAlexW2990465007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.