ArticleEJNMMI research2019
Evaluation of SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) in
Article in EJNMMI research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex- and Age-Related Differences in Physiological [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Potential of Lean Body MassMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026Article
- RECIP 1.0 more predictive of overall survival than PSMA PET progression criteria in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Mapping systemic inter-organ metabolic networks across glycemic continuum using whole-body [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Selection of SUV normalization and reference tissue for quantitative [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT analysis.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Advancements in Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals: Innovations in Diagnosis and Therapy for Enhanced Cancer Management.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- The Role of PET Image Quantification in Modern Radiation Therapy.PET clinics · 2025Review
- Development and clinical evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Comparison of Tracer Kinetic Models for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Intermediate Risk Primary Prostate Cancer Patients.Research square · 2023Article
- Tumor Sink Effect inJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- Is SUV Corrected for Lean Body Mass Superior to SUV of Body Weight inMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2021Article
- Evaluation of SUVlean consistency in FDG and PSMA PET/MR with Dixon-, James-, and Janma-based lean body mass correction.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Day-to-day variability of [EJNMMI research · 2020Article
- Normalization by bone volume instead of body weight or lean body mass may be better for quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this analysis was to investigate whether the standardized uptake value (SUV) normalized by lean body mass (SUL) is a more appropriate quantitative parameter compared to the commonly used SUV normalized by patient's weight in MATERIAL AND
methods
resultsSUV was significantly positively correlated with body weight (r = 0.35, p = 0.02). In contrast, SUL was not correlated with body weight (r = 0.23, p = 0.07). No significant differences were found between baseline and follow-up scan (p = 0.52).
conclusionThe Janmahasatian formula annuls the positive correlations between SUV and body weight, suggesting that SUL is preferable to SUV for quantitative analyses of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.