Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792671›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Complications and Their Management Strategies: A "Scoping" Literature Review.

Kemmian D Johnson, Abhilash Perisetti, Benjamin Tharian, Ragesh Thandassery, Priya Jamidar, Hemant Goyal, Sumant Inamdar

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kemmian D JohnsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Ave Suite 436, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Abhilash PerisettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Benjamin TharianDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Ragesh ThandasseryUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Priya JamidarYale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street-1080 LMP, P.O. Box 208019, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Hemant GoyalDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, 111 North Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA, 18503, USA. doc.hemant@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-9042
Sumant InamdarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-known procedure with both diagnostic and therapeutic utilities in managing pancreaticobiliary conditions. With the advancements of endoscopic techniques, ERCP has become a relatively safe and effective procedure. However, as ERCP is increasingly being utilized for different advanced techniques, newer complications have been noticed. Post-ERCP complications are known, and mostly include pancreatitis, infection, hemorrhage, and perforation. The risks of these complications vary depending on several factors, such as patient selection, endoscopist's skills, and the difficulties involved during the procedure. This review discusses post-ERCP complications and management strategies with new and evolving concepts.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangitisCholecystitisDisinfectionDuodenoscopesEquipment ContaminationHumansInfectionsIntestinal PerforationPancreatic DuctsPancreatitisPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyERCPPost-ERCP complicationsPost-ERCP pancreatitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.