Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792645›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2020

Varenicline for cognitive impairment in people with schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Timothy Tanzer, Shelukumar Shah, Catherine Benson, Veronica De Monte, Victoria Gore-Jones, Susan L Rossell, Frances Dark, Steve Kisely, Dan Siskind, Catarina Drumonde Melo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive Deficit in Schizophrenia: From Etiology to Novel Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy TanzerDepartment of Pharmacy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5924-3320
Shelukumar ShahMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Catherine BensonMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Veronica De MonteMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Victoria Gore-JonesMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Susan L RossellCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Frances DarkMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Steve KiselyMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Dan SiskindMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Catarina Drumonde MeloFaculty of Agricultural Sciences and Environment, University of Azores, Rua Capitão João D'Ávila, 9700-042, Angra do Heroísmo, Azore, Portugal. cdrumonde73@gmail.com.
The University of Queensland · AUMetro South Health · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUUniversidade dos Açores · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with schizophrenia frequently have cognitive dysfunction, which does not respond to pharmacological interventions. Varenicline has been identified as a potential treatment option for nicotinic receptor dysfunction with a potential to treat cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of Pubmed, Embase, Psycinfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane Schizophrenia Trial Registry for randomised controlled trials of varenicline in people with schizophrenia for cognitive dysfunction. We excluded trials among people with dementia. We then undertook a meta-analysis with the primary outcome of difference in change of cognitive measures between varenicline and placebo as well as secondary outcomes of difference in rates of adverse events. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on smoking status and study duration.

resultsWe included four papers in the meta-analysis (n = 339). Varenicline was not superior to placebo for overall cognition (SMD = -0.022, 95% CI -0.154-0.110; Z = -0.333; p = 0.739), attention (SMD = -0.047, 95% CI -0.199-0.104; Z = -0.613; p = 0.540), executive function (SMD = -0.060, 95% CI -0.469-0.348; Z =- 0.290; p = 0.772) or processing speed (SMD = 0.038, 95% CI -0.232-0.308; Z = 0.279; p = 0.780). There was no difference in psychotic symptoms, but varenicline was associated with higher rates of nausea. Sensitivity analyses for smoking status and study duration did not alter the results.

conclusionWithin the present literature, varenicline does not appear to be a useful target compound for improving cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Based on these results, a trial would need over 2500 participants to be powered to show statistically significant findings.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHumansNicotinic AgonistsSchizophreniaVareniclineNicotinic AgonistsVareniclinecognitionMeta-analysisSchizophreniaSystematic reviewVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID31792645
OpenAlexW2993740699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.