Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792635›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Detectability of prostate cancer in different parts of the gland with 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

Katsuhiro Ito, Akihiro Furuta, Akira Kido, Yuki Teramoto, Shusuke Akamatsu, Naoki Terada, Toshinari Yamasaki, Takahiro Inoue, Osamu Ogawa, Takashi Kobayashi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katsuhiro ItoDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro FurutaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Akira KidoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki TeramotoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shusuke AkamatsuDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki TeradaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshinari YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahiro InoueDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Osamu OgawaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. ogawao@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated whether the detectability of prostate cancer with 3-Tesla (3T) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) differs by tumor location.

methodsWe identified 136 patients with prostate cancer who underwent 3-T mpMRI before prostatectomy at a single academic center. Two uroradiologists scored all MRIs with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2). A genitourinary pathologist mapped tumor foci from serial whole-mount radical prostatectomy sections. We assessed concordance of images with cancer sites. Tumor foci with Gleason score ≥  3 + 4 or volume ≥ 0.5 mL were considered significant.

resultsA total of 122 foci in 106 cases were identified with mpMRI. Twenty-four were PI-RADS 3, 52 were 4, and 46 were 5. A total of 274 tumor foci were identified with whole-mount pathology. The sensitivity stratified by location to detect significant cancer with a PI-RADS cutoff value of 3 was 56.0% overall, 50.0% in the peripheral zone (PZ), 71.2% in the transitional zone (TZ), 62.4% anterior, 49.5% posterior, 42.0% apical, 63.6% in the midgland, and 43.8% in the gland base. In multivariate analysis, tumor location was not a significant predictor of identification by mpMRI. Tumor volume, Gleason score, and index tumor status were significantly associated with identification by mpMRI.

conclusionsmpMRI detected the majority of high-grade and large cancers, but had low sensitivity in the PZ, posterior, and apex and base of the gland. The high prevalence of low-volume, low-Gleason score index tumors, as well as satellite tumors in those areas, accounted for the difference.

Indexed as

AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificityTumor BurdenDiagnosisMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.