ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020
Digital versus analogue PET in [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- PHYTO-PET - Imaging plant physiology on a long-axial field-of-view PET scanner.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Future opportunities and nuances with the use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer (MD PET 1).Theranostics · 2026Review
- Long Axial Field-of-view PET: A New Era of Quantitative PET Imaging for Theranostic Applications in Clinic.PET clinics · 2025Review
- Lymphoma Therapy Response Assessment with Low-Dose [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Staging of prostate Cancer with ultra-fast PSMA-PET scans enhanced by AI.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Time to shift to Digital PET/CT?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT improves radiomics feature reliability.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- The impact of long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET on oncologic imaging.European journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Focal Unspecific Bone Uptake on [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Long-Axial Field-of-View PET Imaging in Patients with Lymphoma: Challenges and Opportunities.PET clinics · 2024Review
- The superior detection rate of total-body [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Comparison of digital and analog [Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The clinical acceptability of short versus long duration acquisitions for head and neck cancer using long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: a retrospective evaluation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients.European radiology · 2024Article
- Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT for the assessment of inflammation in calcified coronary artery plaques with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Comparison of Digital versus AnalogDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Investigating the influence of long-axial versus short-axial field of view PET/CT on stage migration in lymphoma and non-small cell lung cancer.Nuclear medicine communications · 2023Article
- New thresholds in semi-quantitative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDigital PET/CT scanners represent a significant step forward in molecular imaging. We report here the clinical impact of digital PET in PSMA-PET/CT.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 88 consecutive patients who underwent [
resultsdPET/CT revealed a greater number of PC lesions compared to aPET/CT (326 versus 142) as well as a proportional increase in benign causes of tracer-uptake (144 versus 65). A greater number of scans were noted as pathological for PC on dPET/CT (74/88) compared to aPET/CT (64/88, p < 0.05). The PSMA positivity rate for PC was significantly higher in dPET/CT for the lowest PSA values (PSA < 2.0 ng/ml, p < 0.05).
conclusiondPET/CT detected more PC lesions compared to aPET/CT. A significantly higher rate of pathological PET/CTs was noted in the group with the lowest PSA values. A higher number of benign PSMA-positive lesions were also noted in dPET/CT. The differences could be plausibly explained by the measured imaging characteristics of the scanners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.