Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792558›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020

[Mechanical bowel obstruction in geriatric patients : Etiology and perioperative morbidity/mortality compared with a younger cohort].

C J van Beekum, B Stoffels, M von Websky, J Dohmen, C J J Paul, J C Kalff, T O Vilz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C J van BeekumKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. cornelius.vanbeekum@ukbonn.de.
B StoffelsKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
M von WebskyKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
J DohmenKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
C J J PaulKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
J C KalffKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
T O VilzKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical bowel obstruction is a common condition in geriatric patients in the emergency department. It accounts for up to 50% of all emergency surgeries in the elderly. In recent years, diagnosis and treatment of mechanical bowel obstruction has improved, but little is known whether elderly patients benefit from modern treatment approaches.

objectiveThe aim of the work is to generate knowledge about possible improvement of diagnosis and treatment of mechanical bowel obstruction in the elderly.

methodsA retrospective review of 132 patients was performed comparing geriatric (>80 years of age) and nongeriatric patients (50-70 years of age) admitted with mechanical bowel obstruction. Etiology, time from first contact to operation, bowel resection rate and morbidity/mortality were compared. Data analysis included Fisher's test and Student t‑test.

resultsIn patients under 70 years of age it took 18.23 ± 0.79 h from first contact until laparotomy in the operating room (OR) vs. 43.38 ± 12.08 h in patients above 80 years of age (p = 0.0111). In 58.9% of geriatric patients, resection of bowel was necessary, while only 35.3% of <70-year-old patients needed bowel resection (p = 0.0401). In all, 50% of geriatric patients experienced major complications (Dindo/Clavien >IIIB) vs. only 12.7% of 50- to 70-year-old patients (p = 0.0002). Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was significantly prolonged in geriatric patients compared to younger patients (93.97 ± 17.36 h vs. 26.11 ± 3.73 h, p < 0.0001).

conclusionsTime from first contact in the emergency department until laparotomy in the OR is prolonged in geriatric patients, leading to a higher probability of bowel resection with greater morbidity and mortality. Diagnostics should be intensified and accelerated in geriatric patients. Emergency surgery should be considered earlier.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansIntestinesLaparotomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAgedColorectal surgeryEmergency treatmentMorbidityMortality

Identifiers

PMID31792558
OpenAlexW3154255108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.