Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792465›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2020

Silent synapses dictate cocaine memory destabilization and reconsolidation.

William J Wright, Nicholas M Graziane, Peter A Neumann, Peter J Hamilton, Hannah M Cates, Lauren Fuerst, Alexander Spenceley, Natalie MacKinnon-Booth, Kartik Iyer, Yanhua H Huang and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex-specific role of the 5-HTNature communications · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Specializations in Amygdalar and Hippocampal Innervation of the Primate Nucleus Accumbens Shell.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William J Wright *Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nicholas M Graziane *Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Peter A NeumannDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Peter J HamiltonNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Hannah M CatesNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Lauren FuerstDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexander SpenceleyDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Natalie MacKinnon-BoothDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kartik IyerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3888-0376
Yanhua H HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1770-0196
Yavin ShahamBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-3319
Oliver M SchlüterDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eric J NestlerNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-2000
Yan DongDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. yandong@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-9028
University of Pittsburgh · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Neurobiology Of Relapse To Opiate and Psychostimulant DrugsZIADA000434 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SHAHAM, YAVIN · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
TRANSGENIC COREP01DA008227 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1993 to 2018
$28.1M
Neurotrophic Mechanisms in Opiate and Cocaine ActionR01DA014133 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ERIC J. NESTLER · 2000 to 2026
$12.1M
Predoctorial Training in Basic NeuroscienceT32NS007433 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MERINEY, STEPHEN D · 1998 to 2022
$8.0M
Glial-mediated synaptic remodeling in drug addictionR01DA040620 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Yan Dong, ERIC J. NESTLER · 2016 to 2026
$5.3M
Cocaine-induced adaptation in NMDA receptorsR37DA023206 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Yan Dong · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
Cocaine-induced Adaptation in NMDA Receptors in Nucleus AccumbensR01DA023206 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DONG, YAN · 2008 to 2017
$3.0M
Dopamine Signaling and Synaptic Plasticity in the Nucleus AccumbensR01MH101147 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HUANG, YANHUA H · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Synaptic Reorganization in Drug AddictionR01DA035805 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HUANG, YANHUA H · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Circuitry Progression of Cocaine-induced Cellular AdaptationR21DA047861 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONG, YAN · 2019 to 2020
$430k
Glutamatergic signaling in accumbens astrocytesR21DA044538 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONG, YAN · 2017 to 2018
$399k
Fast-spiking interneurons in the Nucleus Accumbens and cue-induced cocaine seekingF31DA043940 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WRIGHT, WILLIAM JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$161k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA043940NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA008227NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014133NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023206NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035805NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040620NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044538NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA047861NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA023206NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101147NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cocaine-associated memories are persistent, but, on retrieval, become temporarily destabilized and vulnerable to disruptions, followed by reconsolidation. To explore the synaptic underpinnings for these memory dynamics, we studied AMPA receptor (AMPAR)-silent excitatory synapses, which are generated in the nucleus accumbens by cocaine self-administration, and subsequently mature after prolonged withdrawal by recruiting AMPARs, echoing acquisition and consolidation of cocaine memories. We show that, on memory retrieval after prolonged withdrawal, the matured silent synapses become AMPAR-silent again, followed by re-maturation ~6 h later, defining the onset and termination of a destabilization window of cocaine memories. These synaptic dynamics are timed by Rac1, with decreased and increased Rac1 activities opening and closing, respectively, the silent synapse-mediated destabilization window. Preventing silent synapse re-maturation within the destabilization window decreases cue-induced cocaine seeking. Thus, cocaine-generated silent synapses constitute a discrete synaptic ensemble dictating the dynamics of cocaine-associated memories and can be targeted for memory disruption.

Indexed as

AnimalsCocaine-Related DisordersDrug-Seeking BehaviorMaleMemory ConsolidationNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySynapses

Identifiers

PMID31792465
PMCPMC6930359
OpenAlexW2993460533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.