Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792423›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2020

Behavioural responses to a photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis implanted in non-human primates.

Paul-Henri Prévot, Kevin Gehere, Fabrice Arcizet, Himanshu Akolkar, Mina A Khoei, Kévin Blaize, Omar Oubari, Pierre Daye, Marion Lanoë, Manon Valet and 23 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A flexible photoacoustic retinal prosthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Metaverse Wearables for Immersive Digital Healthcare: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul-Henri PrévotInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Kevin GehereInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Fabrice ArcizetInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Himanshu AkolkarInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0279-1910
Mina A KhoeiInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Kévin BlaizeInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Omar OubariInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Pierre DayeInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Marion LanoëInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Manon ValetInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Sami DalouzInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Paul LangloisInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Elric EspositoInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Valérie ForsterInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Elisabeth DubusInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Nicolas WattiezInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière - CNRS UMR 7225, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Elena BrazhnikovaInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Céline Nouvel-JaillardInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Yannick LeMerFondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Joanna DemillyMolecular Imaging Research Center (MIRCen), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Claire-Maëlle FovetMolecular Imaging Research Center (MIRCen), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Philippe HantrayeMolecular Imaging Research Center (MIRCen), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Morgane WeissenburgerInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière - CNRS UMR 7225, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Henri LorachHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Elodie BouilletPixium Vision, Paris, France.
Martin DeterrePixium Vision, Paris, France.
Ralf HornigPixium Vision, Paris, France.
Guillaume BucPixium Vision, Paris, France.
José-Alain SahelInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Guillaume ChenegrosInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Pierre Pouget *Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière - CNRS UMR 7225, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Ryad Benosman *Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France.
Serge Picaud *Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM and CNRS, Paris, France. serge.picaud@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-5145
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRPixium Vision (France) · FRCEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses · FRFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · FRStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal dystrophies and age-related macular degeneration related to photoreceptor degeneration can cause blindness. In blind patients, although the electrical activation of the residual retinal circuit can provide useful artificial visual perception, the resolutions of current retinal prostheses have been limited either by large electrodes or small numbers of pixels. Here we report the evaluation, in three awake non-human primates, of a previously reported near-infrared-light-sensitive photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis. We show that multipixel stimulation of the prosthesis within radiation safety limits enabled eye tracking in the animals, that they responded to stimulations directed at the implant with repeated saccades and that the implant-induced responses were present two years after device implantation. Our findings pave the way for the clinical evaluation of the prosthesis in patients affected by dry atrophic age-related macular degeneration.

Indexed as

SaccadesVisual PerceptionVisual ProsthesisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEye Movement MeasurementsMacaca fascicularisMacular DegenerationMalePhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID31792423
OpenAlexW2989950249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.