Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792408›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2019

Phage combination therapies for bacterial wilt disease in tomato.

Xiaofang Wang, Zhong Wei, Keming Yang, Jianing Wang, Alexandre Jousset, Yangchun Xu, Qirong Shen, Ville-Petri Friman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
34.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaofang Wang *Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China.
Zhong Wei *Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China. weizhong@njau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-4897
Keming YangJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China.
Jianing WangJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China.
Alexandre JoussetJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China.
Yangchun XuJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China.
Qirong ShenJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China. qirongshen@njau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-2506
Ville-Petri FrimanJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang, Nanjing, China. ville.friman@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-157X
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNThe Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages have been proposed as an alternative to pesticides to kill bacterial pathogens of crops. However, the efficacy of phage biocontrol is variable and poorly understood in natural rhizosphere microbiomes. We studied biocontrol efficacy of different phage combinations on Ralstonia solanacearum infection in tomato. Increasing the number of phages in combinations decreased the incidence of disease by up to 80% in greenhouse and field experiments during a single crop season. The decreased incidence of disease was explained by a reduction in pathogen density and the selection for phage-resistant but slow-growing pathogen strains, together with enrichment for bacterial species that were antagonistic toward R. solanacearum. Phage treatment did not affect the existing rhizosphere microbiota. Specific phage combinations have potential as precision tools to control plant pathogenic bacteria.

Indexed as

Ralstonia solanacearumBacteriophagesPest Control, BiologicalPlant DiseasesRhizosphereSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID31792408
OpenAlexW2990936965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.