Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792402›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2020

The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions.

Charles Efferson, Sonja Vogt, Ernst Fehr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contagion and escalation of rule violations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The power of leadership in changing social norms in heterogeneous societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Why people follow rules.Nature human behaviour · 2025
    Article
  5. A norm about harvest division is maintained by a desire to follow tradition, not by social policing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prestige bias in cultural evolutionary dynamics.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. When norm change hurts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Green preferences sustain greenwashing: challenges in the cultural transition to a sustainable future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Long-distance social relationships can both undercut and promote local natural resource management.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Cooperation without punishment.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Paradox of diversity in the collective brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles EffersonHEC Lausanne, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. charles.efferson@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-4497
Sonja VogtDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-309X
Ernst FehrDepartment of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-7821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a policy-maker promoting the end of a harmful tradition, conformist social influence is a compelling mechanism. If an intervention convinces enough people to abandon the tradition, this can spill over and induce others to follow. A key objective is thus to activate such spillovers and amplify an intervention's effects. With female genital cutting as a motivating example, we develop empirically informed analytical and simulation models to examine this idea. Even if conformity pervades decision-making, spillovers can range from irrelevant to indispensable. Our analysis highlights three considerations. First, ordinary forms of individual heterogeneity can severely limit spillovers, and understanding the heterogeneity in a population is essential. Second, although interventions often target samples of the population biased towards ending the harmful tradition, targeting a representative sample is a more robust way to achieve spillovers. Finally, if the harmful tradition contributes to group identity, the success of spillovers can depend critically on disrupting the link between identity and tradition.

Indexed as

CultureDecision MakingModels, PsychologicalSocial ConformitySocial IdentificationAdultCircumcision, FemaleFemaleHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.