Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792376›Full record

ReviewNature cell biology2019

Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways.

Charles D Yeh, Christopher D Richardson, Jacob E Corn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 239 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deciphering the Impact of RAC1-SPTAN1 in ARPKD Cystogenesis Using Multifaceted Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. CRISPR and the Future of Cardiac Disease Therapy: A New Genetic Frontier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evolution of Prime Editing: Enhancing Efficiency and Expanding Capacity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles D YehDepartment of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2707-6035
Christopher D RichardsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-4851
Jacob E CornDepartment of Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. jacob.corn@biol.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-5309

Funding

Discovering mechanisms that regulate organelle autophagyDP2HL141006 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CORN, JACOB ELLERY · 2017 to 2017
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS DP2 HL141006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells deploy overlapping repair pathways to resolve DNA damage. Advancements in genome editing take advantage of these pathways to produce permanent genetic changes. Despite recent improvements, genome editing can produce diverse outcomes that can introduce risks in clinical applications. Although homology-directed repair is attractive for its ability to encode precise edits, it is particularly difficult in human cells. Here we discuss the DNA repair pathways that underlie genome editing and strategies to favour various outcomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA DamageDNA RepairEukaryotic CellsGene EditingHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.