Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792216›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A cancer rainbow mouse for visualizing the functional genomics of oncogenic clonal expansion.

Peter G Boone, Lauren K Rochelle, Joshua D Ginzel, Veronica Lubkov, Wendy L Roberts, P J Nicholls, Cheryl Bock, Mei Lang Flowers, Richard J von Furstenberg, Barry R Stripp and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Precision preclinical modeling to advance cancer treatment.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cell competition in development, homeostasis and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clonal Tracing of Heart Regeneration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter G BooneDivision of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Lauren K RochelleDivision of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Joshua D GinzelDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Veronica LubkovDivision of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Wendy L RobertsDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
P J NichollsDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Cheryl BockTransgenic Mouse Facility, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Mei Lang FlowersTransgenic Mouse Facility, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Richard J von FurstenbergDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Barry R StrippDepartment of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pankaj AgarwalDivision of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Alexander D BorowskyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and The Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Robert D CardiffDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and The Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Larry S BarakDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Marc G CaronDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
H Kim LyerlyDivision of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Joshua C SnyderDivision of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. joshua.snyder@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-3371
Duke University · USDuke Cancer InstituteUniversity of California, Davis · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA100639 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LYERLY, HERBERT KIM · 2004 to 2013
$8.0M
Coordination Center for Open Collaboration in Systems BiologyU24CA209923 · NCI · SAGE BIONETWORKS · PI BLETZ, JULIE ANN · 2016 to 2021
$7.4M
A Cancer Rainbow Mouse for Simultaneous Assessment of Multiple OncogenesR33CA191198 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CARON, MARC G. · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
Supplemental Funds for K22 Establishing the molecular and cellular mechanisms of Lgr5 signaling for controlling cancer stem cell behaviorK22CA212058 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, JOSHUA CLAIR · 2017 to 2020
$622k
A Cancer Rainbow Mouse for the Simultaneous Assessment of Multiple OncogenesR21CA173245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CARON, MARC G. · 2012 to 2013
$476k
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA100639NCI NIH HHS K22 CA212058NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173245NCI NIH HHS R33 CA191198NCI NIH HHS U24 CA209923NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field cancerization is a premalignant process marked by clones of oncogenic mutations spreading through the epithelium. The timescales of intestinal field cancerization can be variable and the mechanisms driving the rapid spread of oncogenic clones are unknown. Here we use a Cancer rainbow (Crainbow) modelling system for fluorescently barcoding somatic mutations and directly visualizing the clonal expansion and spread of oncogenes. Crainbow shows that mutations of ß-catenin (Ctnnb1) within the intestinal stem cell results in widespread expansion of oncogenes during perinatal development but not in adults. In contrast, mutations that extrinsically disrupt the stem cell microenvironment can spread in adult intestine without delay. We observe the rapid spread of premalignant clones in Crainbow mice expressing oncogenic Rspondin-3 (RSPO3), which occurs by increasing crypt fission and inhibiting crypt fixation. Crainbow modelling provides insight into how somatic mutations rapidly spread and a plausible mechanism for predetermining the intratumor heterogeneity found in colon cancers.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationColonic NeoplasmsHumansMiceMutationNeoplastic Stem CellsOncogenesThrombospondinsR-spondin3 protein, mouseThrombospondins

Identifiers

PMID31792216
PMCPMC6889384
OpenAlexW2989972847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.