Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792199›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Senescent cell turnover slows with age providing an explanation for the Gompertz law.

Omer Karin, Amit Agrawal, Ziv Porat, Valery Krizhanovsky, Uri Alon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why we age.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What sets the mutation rate of a cell type in an animal species?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omer KarinDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Ziv PoratDepartment of Biological Services, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-181X
Valery KrizhanovskyDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel. valery.krizhanovsky@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3977-5482
Uri AlonDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel. uri.alon@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-5362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A causal factor in mammalian aging is the accumulation of senescent cells (SnCs). SnCs cause chronic inflammation, and removing SnCs decelerates aging in mice. Despite their importance, turnover rates of SnCs are unknown, and their connection to aging dynamics is unclear. Here we use longitudinal SnC measurements and induction experiments to show that SnCs turn over rapidly in young mice, with a half-life of days, but slow their own removal rate to a half-life of weeks in old mice. This leads to a critical-slowing-down that generates persistent SnC fluctuations. We further demonstrate that a mathematical model, in which death occurs when fluctuating SnCs cross a threshold, quantitatively recapitulates the Gompertz law of mortality in mice and humans. The model can go beyond SnCs to explain the effects of lifespan-modulating interventions in Drosophila and C. elegans, including scaling of survival-curves and rapid effects of dietary shifts on mortality.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAge FactorsAgingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophilaFemaleLongevityMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID31792199
PMCPMC6889273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.