Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31792092›Full record

ArticleNeurology2020

Risks and benefits of unapproved disease-modifying treatments for neurodegenerative disease.

Aden C Feustel, Amanda MacPherson, Dean A Fergusson, Karl Kieburtz, Jonathan Kimmelman

Erratum issuedAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying Patient Investment in Novel Neurological Drug Development.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  10. Fluconazole Is Neuroprotective via Interactions with the IGF-1 Receptor.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Comparison of Patient and Expert Perceptions of the Attainment of Research Milestones in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Aden C FeustelFrom the Biomedical Ethics Unit (A.C.F., A.M., J.K.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (D.A.F.), ON, Canada; and Department of Neurology (K.K.), University of Rochester, NY.
Amanda MacPhersonFrom the Biomedical Ethics Unit (A.C.F., A.M., J.K.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (D.A.F.), ON, Canada; and Department of Neurology (K.K.), University of Rochester, NY.
Dean A FergussonFrom the Biomedical Ethics Unit (A.C.F., A.M., J.K.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (D.A.F.), ON, Canada; and Department of Neurology (K.K.), University of Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-2485
Karl KieburtzFrom the Biomedical Ethics Unit (A.C.F., A.M., J.K.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (D.A.F.), ON, Canada; and Department of Neurology (K.K.), University of Rochester, NY.
Jonathan KimmelmanFrom the Biomedical Ethics Unit (A.C.F., A.M., J.K.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (D.A.F.), ON, Canada; and Department of Neurology (K.K.), University of Rochester, NY. jonathan.kimmelman@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-6779
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether patients randomized to unapproved, disease-modifying interventions in neurodegenerative disease trials have better outcomes than patients randomized to placebo by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk and benefit experienced by patients in randomized placebo-controlled trials testing investigational treatments for Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, Huntington disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for results of randomized trials testing non-Food and Drug Administration-approved, putatively disease-modifying interventions from January 2005 to May 2018. Trial characteristics were double-extracted. Coprimary endpoints were the treatment advantage over placebo on efficacy (standardized mean difference in outcomes) and safety (risk ratios of serious adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events), calculated with random effects meta-analyses. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018103798).

resultsWe included 113 trials (n = 39,875 patients). There was no significant efficacy advantage associated with assignment to putatively disease-modifying interventions compared to placebo for Alzheimer disease (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.07 to 0.01), Parkinson disease (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.15), ALS (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.30), or Huntington disease (0.02, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.31). Patients with Alzheimer disease assigned to active treatment were at higher risk of experiencing serious adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.27) and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21-1.70).

conclusionsAssignment to active treatment was not beneficial for any of the indications examined and may have been slightly disadvantageous for patients with Alzheimer disease. Our findings suggest that patients with neurodegenerative diseases are not, on the whole, harmed by assignment to placebo when participating in trials.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesHumansRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31792092
PMCPMC7011691
OpenAlexW2991412921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.