ArticleNeurology2020
Risks and benefits of unapproved disease-modifying treatments for neurodegenerative disease.
Article in Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Food Potential ofNutrients · 2026Article
- Intranasal delivery route for neurodegenerative diseases: recent insights and future directions.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Phytoconstituents as Potential Therapeutics against Enzymatic Targets for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Current protein & peptide science · 2026Review
- Neuropharmacological effects of calycosin: a translational review of molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- A Longitudinal Two-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol to Evaluate the Efficacy of Yoga on Progression of Disease in Early Parkinson's Disease.Annals of neurosciences · 2025Article
- Design of Promising Thiazoloindazole-Based Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Guided by Molecular Docking and Experimental Insights.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2024Article
- An Update on Parkinson's Disease and its Neurodegenerative Counterparts.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Ethical Aspects of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Alzheimer's Disease: Potentials and Challenges of a Seemingly Harmless Method.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Article
- Quantifying Patient Investment in Novel Neurological Drug Development.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Article
- Fluconazole Is Neuroprotective via Interactions with the IGF-1 Receptor.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Article
- Long-term Effect of Regular Physical Activity and Exercise Habits in Patients With Early Parkinson Disease.Neurology · 2022Observational
- Diminishing clinical impact for post-approval cancer clinical trials: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2022Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Pridopidine on Treatment of Patients with Huntington's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022Review
- Sleep, Pain, and Neurodegeneration: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Comparison of Patient and Expert Perceptions of the Attainment of Research Milestones in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021Article
- Risks and benefits of unapproved disease-modifying treatments for neurodegenerative disease.Neurology · 2020Article
- Klotho Pathways, Myelination Disorders, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Epigenetic Drugs.BioResearch open access · 2020Review
- From the Gut to the Brain and Back: Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Network Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Bringing Advanced Therapies for Parkinson's Disease to the Clinic: An Analysis of Ethical Issues.Journal of Parkinson's diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether patients randomized to unapproved, disease-modifying interventions in neurodegenerative disease trials have better outcomes than patients randomized to placebo by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk and benefit experienced by patients in randomized placebo-controlled trials testing investigational treatments for Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, Huntington disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for results of randomized trials testing non-Food and Drug Administration-approved, putatively disease-modifying interventions from January 2005 to May 2018. Trial characteristics were double-extracted. Coprimary endpoints were the treatment advantage over placebo on efficacy (standardized mean difference in outcomes) and safety (risk ratios of serious adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events), calculated with random effects meta-analyses. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018103798).
resultsWe included 113 trials (n = 39,875 patients). There was no significant efficacy advantage associated with assignment to putatively disease-modifying interventions compared to placebo for Alzheimer disease (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.07 to 0.01), Parkinson disease (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.15), ALS (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.30), or Huntington disease (0.02, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.31). Patients with Alzheimer disease assigned to active treatment were at higher risk of experiencing serious adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.27) and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21-1.70).
conclusionsAssignment to active treatment was not beneficial for any of the indications examined and may have been slightly disadvantageous for patients with Alzheimer disease. Our findings suggest that patients with neurodegenerative diseases are not, on the whole, harmed by assignment to placebo when participating in trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.