Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31791932›Full record

SynthesisIndian journal of medical ethics

Affirmative action, minorities, and public services in India: Charting a future research and practice agenda.

Upendra Bhojani, C Madegowda, N S Prashanth, Pragati Hebbar, Tolib Mirzoev, Saffron Karlsen, Ghazala Mir

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Indian journal of medical ethics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Upendra BhojaniFaculty & Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance Fellow, Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, INDIA.
C MadegowdaSecretary, Zilla Budakattu Soligara Abhivruddhi Sangha, Chamarajanagar, INDIA; Senior Research Associate, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru INDIA.
N S PrashanthFaculty and Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance fellow, Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, INDIA.
Pragati HebbarFaculty & Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance Fellow, Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru INDIA.
Tolib MirzoevAssociate Professor of International Health Policy and Systems, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Saffron KarlsenSenior Lecturer, School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ghazala MirAssociate Professor, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/17/1/503338DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/16/1/502648DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/17/1/503346Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Health Policy in India mentions equity as a key policy principle and emphasises the role of affirmative action in achieving health equity for a range of excluded groups. We conducted a scoping review of literature and three multi-stakeholder workshops to better understand the available evidence on the impact of affirmative action policies in enhancing the inclusion of ethnic and religious minorities in health, education and governance in India. We consider these public services an important mechanism to enhance the social inclusion of many excluded groups. On the whole, the available empirical evidence regarding the uptake and impact of affirmative action policies is limited. Reservation policies in higher education and electoral constituencies have had a limited positive impact in enhancing the access and representation of minorities. However, reservations in government jobs remain poorly implemented. In general, class, gender and location intersect, creating inter- and intra-group differentials in the impact of these policies. Several government initiatives aimed at enhancing the access of religious minorities to public services/institutions remain poorly evaluated. Future research and practice need to focus on neglected but relevant research themes such as the role of private sector providers in supporting the inclusion of minorities, the political aspects of policy development and implementation, and the role of social mobilisation and movements. Evidence gaps also need to be filled in relation to information systems for monitoring and assessment of social disadvantage, implementation and evaluative research on inclusive policies and understanding how the pathways to inequities can be effectively addressed.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth EquityHealth PolicyHumansIndiaMinority GroupsPublic PolicyPublic Sector

Identifiers

PMID31791932
PMCPMC7212055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.