ReviewMalaria journal2019
A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008-2018): performance, procurement and policy.
Review in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and associated factors of microscopy-confirmed malaria among the general population in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Malaria journal · 2026Pooled it
- Parasitaemia and fever in uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Pooled it
- A Dual, Systematic Approach to Malaria Diagnostic Biomarker Discovery.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Pooled it
- Persistence of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigenaemia after artemisinin combination therapy is not associated with gametocytes.Malaria journal · 2022Trial
- Absence of Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2 and 3 (Pfhrp2/3) Gene Deletions in Rizal, Palawan, the Philippines.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Noninvasive malaria detection beyond blood sampling.Sensors & diagnostics · 2026Review
- Quality assurance in rapid diagnostic tests for accurate diagnosis of malaria.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Evaluation of malaria rapid diagnostic test kit performance in a high-transmission setting: a facility-based cross-sectional study in rural Ghana.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation of NxTek™ Eliminate Malaria-PF test and biocredit rapid diagnostic tests for detecting Plasmodium species in Southern Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Field and laboratory evaluation of Abbott-Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf/Pv RDT performance in a high-transmission setting: contrasting results with a low-endemic area.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the Smart Home Model for Integrated Malaria Prevention: A Case-Control Study in Oyam District, Uganda.Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Article
- Heme oxygenase-1 and malaria pathogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Spatial and genetic dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein2 in sub-Saharan Africa.PloS one · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Plasmodium Species Using Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Cameroon: First-Year Data From Routine Malaria Surveillance.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- The effects of introduced procedural errors on malaria rapid diagnostic test performance in a laboratory setting.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Assessment of a highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test for reactive case detection of Plasmodium Falciparum infections in Myanmar.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Care management and determinants of day 14 mortality in severely ill children aged under 5 years subsequent to hypoxaemia diagnosed using routine pulse oximetry in primary care: evidence from the AIRE project.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with severe illness in West African children under 5 years of age detected with routine pulse oximetry in primary care.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Investigating the Abbott-Bioline™ malaria antigen Pf/Pv rapid diagnostic test.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Field Evaluation of Mobile Molecular Differential Tests in DRC and Nigeria.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member States, led to the creation of an independent, internationally coordinated RDT evaluation programme aiming to provide comparative performance data of commercially available RDTs. Products were assessed against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax samples diluted to two densities, along with malaria-negative samples from healthy individuals, and from people with immunological abnormalities or non-malarial infections. Three measures were established as indicators of performance, (i) panel detection score (PDS) determined against low density panels prepared from P. falciparum and P. vivax wild-type samples, (ii) false positive rate, and (iii) invalid rate, and minimum criteria defined. Over eight rounds of the programme, 332 products were tested. Between Rounds 1 and 8, substantial improvements were seen in all performance measures. The number of products meeting all criteria increased from 26.8% (11/41) in Round 1, to 79.4% (27/34) in Round 8. While products submitted to further evaluation rounds under compulsory re-testing did not show improvement, those voluntarily resubmitted showed significant increases in P. falciparum (p = 0.002) and P. vivax PDS (p < 0.001), with more products meeting the criteria upon re-testing. Through this programme, the differentiation of products based on comparative performance, combined with policy changes has been influential in the acceptance of malaria RDTs as a case-management tool, enabling a policy of parasite-based diagnosis prior to treatment. Publication of product testing results has produced a transparent market allowing users and procurers to clearly identify appropriate products for their situation, and could form a model for introduction of other, broad-scale diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.