Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31791354›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2019

A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008-2018): performance, procurement and policy.

Jane Cunningham, Sophie Jones, Michelle L Gatton, John W Barnwell, Qin Cheng, Peter L Chiodini, Jeffrey Glenn, Sandra Incardona, Cara Kosack, Jennifer Luchavez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Dual, Systematic Approach to Malaria Diagnostic Biomarker Discovery.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Heme oxygenase-1 and malaria pathogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Jane CunninghamWorld Health Organization (WHO), Global Malaria Programme, 20 Appia Avenue, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. cunninghamj@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-4822
Sophie JonesIndependent Consultant, Bedford Hill, Balham, London, SW12 9HR, UK.
Michelle L GattonSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
John W BarnwellMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Qin ChengAustralian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute (ADFMIDI), Gallipoli Barracks Enoggera, 4051, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter L ChiodiniDepartment of Clinical Parasitology, Hospital for Tropical Diseases (HTD), Mortimer Market Centre, Mortimer Market, Capper St, Fitzrovia, London, UK.
Jeffrey GlennMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Bldg. 23, Room 10-169, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop D-67, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Sandra IncardonaFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Campus Biotech, Building B, Level 0, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cara KosackMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Plantage Middenlaan 14, 1018 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennifer LuchavezParasitology Department of the Research Institute of Tropical Medicine (RITM), 9002 Research Dr, Alabang, Muntinlupa, The Philippines.
Didier MenardLaboratoire d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire du Paludisme, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Monivong Boulevard, PO 983, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sina NhemLaboratoire d'Epidémiologie Moléculaire du Paludisme, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Monivong Boulevard, PO 983, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Wellington OyiboDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos (UL), Private Mail Bag 12003, Lagos, Nigeria.
Roxanne R Rees-ChannerDepartment of Clinical Parasitology, Hospital for Tropical Diseases (HTD), Mortimer Market Centre, Mortimer Market, Capper St, Fitzrovia, London, UK.
Iveth GonzalezFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Campus Biotech, Building B, Level 0, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
David BellFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Campus Biotech, Building B, Level 0, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
FIND · CHCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge · KHGallipoli Medical Research Foundation · AULondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMédecins Sans Frontières · NLQueensland University of Technology · AUResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHUniversity of Lagos · NGWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP41698UNITAID Grant on Sustainable GlobalUNITAID National Quality Control for Malaria Rapid Diagnostic TestsUSAID/JSI GPO-I-00-06-00007-00/AID-OAA-TO-11-00012World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member States, led to the creation of an independent, internationally coordinated RDT evaluation programme aiming to provide comparative performance data of commercially available RDTs. Products were assessed against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax samples diluted to two densities, along with malaria-negative samples from healthy individuals, and from people with immunological abnormalities or non-malarial infections. Three measures were established as indicators of performance, (i) panel detection score (PDS) determined against low density panels prepared from P. falciparum and P. vivax wild-type samples, (ii) false positive rate, and (iii) invalid rate, and minimum criteria defined. Over eight rounds of the programme, 332 products were tested. Between Rounds 1 and 8, substantial improvements were seen in all performance measures. The number of products meeting all criteria increased from 26.8% (11/41) in Round 1, to 79.4% (27/34) in Round 8. While products submitted to further evaluation rounds under compulsory re-testing did not show improvement, those voluntarily resubmitted showed significant increases in P. falciparum (p = 0.002) and P. vivax PDS (p < 0.001), with more products meeting the criteria upon re-testing. Through this programme, the differentiation of products based on comparative performance, combined with policy changes has been influential in the acceptance of malaria RDTs as a case-management tool, enabling a policy of parasite-based diagnosis prior to treatment. Publication of product testing results has produced a transparent market allowing users and procurers to clearly identify appropriate products for their situation, and could form a model for introduction of other, broad-scale diagnostics.

Indexed as

World Health OrganizationDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxSensitivity and SpecificityMalariaPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxProduct improvementRapid diagnostic tests

Identifiers

PMID31791354
PMCPMC6889598
OpenAlexW2993000058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.