Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31791332›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2019

Assessing the impact of the addition of pyriproxyfen on the durability of permethrin-treated bed nets in Burkina Faso: a compound-randomized controlled trial.

Kobié H Toé, Frank Mechan, Julie-Anne A Tangena, Marion Morris, Joanna Solino, Emile F S Tchicaya, Alphonse Traoré, Hanafy Ismail, James Maas, Natalie Lissenden and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of YaheParasites & vectors · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kobié H ToéCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Frank MechanVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Julie-Anne A TangenaVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Marion MorrisVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Joanna SolinoVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Emile F S TchicayaSwiss Centre for Scientific Research in Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Alphonse TraoréCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Hanafy IsmailVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
James MaasVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Natalie LissendenVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Margaret PinderDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Steve W LindsayDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Alfred B TionoCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Hilary RansonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Hilary.Ranson@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-8247
N'Falé SagnonCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme · BFDurham University · GBSwiss Centre for Scientific Research · CI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) treated with pyrethroids are the foundation of malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. Rising pyrethroid resistance in vectors, however, has driven the development of alternative net formulations. Here the durability of polyethylene nets with a novel combination of a pyrethroid, permethrin, and the insect juvenile hormone mimic, pyriproxyfen (PPF), compared to a standard permethrin LLIN, was assessed in rural Burkina Faso.

methodsA compound-randomized controlled trial was completed in two villages. In one village 326 of the PPF-permethrin nets (Olyset Duo) and 327 standard LLINs (Olyset) were distributed to assess bioefficacy. In a second village, 170 PPF-permethrin nets and 376 LLINs were distributed to assess survivorship. Nets were followed at 6-monthly intervals for 3 years. Bioefficacy was assessed by exposing permethrin-susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquito strains to standard World Health Organization (WHO) cone and tunnel tests with impacts on fertility measured in the resistant strain. Insecticide content was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. LLIN survivorship was recorded with a questionnaire and assessed by comparing the physical integrity using the proportionate hole index (pHI).

resultsThe PPF-permethrin net met WHO bioefficacy criteria (≥ 80% mortality or ≥ 95% knockdown) for the first 18 months, compared to 6 months for the standard LLIN. Mean mosquito mortality for PPF-permethrin nets, across all time points, was 8.6% (CI 2.6-14.6%) higher than the standard LLIN. Fertility rates were reduced after PPF-permethrin net exposure at 1-month post distribution, but not later. Permethrin content of both types of nets remained within the target range of 20 g/kg ± 25% for 242/248 nets tested. The pyriproxyfen content of PPF-permethrin nets declined by 54%, from 10.4 g/kg (CI 10.2-10.6) to 4.7 g/kg (CI 3.5-6.0, p < 0.001) over 36 months. Net survivorship was poor, with only 13% of PPF-permethrin nets and 12% of LLINs still present in the original household after 36 months. There was no difference in the fabric integrity or survivorship between the two net types.

conclusionThe PPF-permethrin net, Olyset Duo, met or exceeded the performance of the WHO-recommended standard LLIN (Olyset) in the current study but both net types failed the 3-year WHO bioefficacy criteria.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlPermethrinPyridinesAnimalsBurkina FasoHumansInsecticidesMosquito VectorsInsecticidesPermethrinPyridinespyriproxyfenAnopheles gambiaeBurkina FasoLong-lasting insecticidal netsMalaria controlNet durabilityOlysetOlyset DuoPermethrinPyriproxyfen

Identifiers

PMID31791332
PMCPMC6889366
OpenAlexW2994086507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.