Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31791269›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2019

Baseline circulating stem-like cells predict survival in patients with metastatic breast Cancer.

Chun-Hui Lee, Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Tyler Min-Hsien Wu, Ting-Shiuan Yeh, Hung-Ming Wang, Yung-Chan Lin, Jen-Shi Chen, Chia-Lin Lee, Wen-Kuan Huang, Tsung-Min Hung and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lymph Liquid Biopsy for Detection of Cancer Stem Cells.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Chun-Hui LeeDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Jason Chia-Hsun HsiehCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tyler Min-Hsien WuCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ting-Shiuan YehCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hung-Ming WangCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yung-Chan LinCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jen-Shi ChenCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chia-Lin LeeDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wen-Kuan HuangCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tsung-Min HungCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Tsen YenCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Sheng-Chieh ChanCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wen-Chi ChouCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Feng-Che KuanDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, Taiwan.
Ching-Chih HuCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Pei-Hung ChangCirculating Tumour Cell Lab, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. ph555chang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-0277

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG2D0171, CMRPG2D0172, CMRPG2G0681, CMRPG2G0682Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG2D0173Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG3G1131-1133, CMRPG3H0871-73Chang Gung Memorial Hospital PMRPG3G0791, CMRPG3G0771, CORPG3F0731, CMRPG3E1631-33Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-107-2314-B-182-053, MOST-104-2314-B-182-031-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-108-2628-B-182A-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with breast cancer prognosis. Research is limited regarding the role of circulating cancer stem-like cells (cCSCs) considering the treatment response and survival among patients with metastatic breast cancer. Accordingly, we performed this prospective study to clarify the prognostic significance of baseline cCSCs for metastatic breast cancer in terms of first-line chemotherapy.

methodsBetween April 2014 and January 2016, we prospectively enrolled 48 patients with stage IV breast invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent first-line chemotherapy. We identified and analyzed CTCs and cCSCs by using a protocol based on negative selection and flow cytometry before chemotherapy. CTCs were identified as EpCAM

resultsWe identified CTCs in all the enrolled patients, with a median number of 33.9/mL CTCs. CSCs were isolated in 97.9% of the patients; the median percentage of cCSCs was 14.7%. A high baseline level of cCSCs was correlated with an inferior tumor response rate (54.2% vs. 95.8%, p < 0.001), overall survival (OS; median: 27.7 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001), and progression-free survival (PFS; median: 5.7 vs. 18.0 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that along with other clinical variables, baseline cCSCs remained an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS.

conclusionsBaseline cCSCs predict the treatment response as well as survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Therefore, the measurement of cCSCs may assist in identifying early cancer treatment response and prognosis.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCell CountFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingNeoplastic Stem CellsPrognosisProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAC133 AntigenPROM1 protein, humanBreast cancerCancer stem cellsCD133ChemotherapyCirculating tumor cells

Identifiers

PMID31791269
PMCPMC6889331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.