SynthesisBMC neurology2019
Detecting delirium in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review of test accuracy.
Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applicability of the interventions recommended for patients at risk or with delirium in medical and post-acute settings: a systematic review and a Nominal Group Technique study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the 4AT for Delirium Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic test accuracies of 4AT items are consistent across the range of baseline cognition: results from two prospective studies.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Risk-predicting and screening tools of post-stroke delirium: a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of CAM-ICU and ICDSC for Detection of Early Delirium in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-sectional Study.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- [Recent clinical studies and the S3 guidelines on stroke].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Management of delirium in acute stroke patients: a position paper by the Austrian Stroke Society on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024Review
- The 4AT scale for rapid detection of delirium in emergency department triage.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Delirium Leads to Poor In-Hospital and 90-Day Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis or Intraarterial Therapy.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Diagnostic test accuracy of assessment tools for detecting delirium in patients with acute stroke: commentary of a systematic review.British journal of neuroscience nursing · 2022Article
- The relationship of acute delirium with cognitive and psychiatric symptoms after stroke: a longitudinal study.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Barriers to completing the 4AT for delirium and its clinical implementation in two hospitals: a mixed-methods study.European geriatric medicine · 2022Article
- Speech-language pathology approaches to neurorehabilitation in acute care during COVID-19: Capitalizing on neuroplasticity.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Effects of Synchronized Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on the Submental Muscles During Ingestion of a Specified Volume of Soft Food in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Dysphagia Following Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with acute stroke are particularly vulnerable to delirium episodes. Although delirium detection is important, no evidence-based recommendations have been established to date on how these patients should be routinely screened for delirium or which tool should be used for this purpose in this population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify delirium screening tools for patients with acute stroke and to summarise their accuracy.
methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of Medline, CINAHL and Scopus databases was performed to include: (a) diagnostic test accuracy studies; (b) evaluating tools detecting delirium among patients with acute stroke; (c) written in English; (d) published up to September 2018. The included studies were assessed in their quality by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.
resultsA total of four studies have been performed to date in the field with a variable quality for the methodology used and documentation of the accuracy of mainly two tools, as (1) the 4-Assessment Test for delirium (4AT), reporting a range of sensitivity from 90.2 to 100% and a specificity from 64.5 to 86%; and (2) the Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) showing a sensitivity of 76% (95% Confidence of Interval [CI] 55-91) and a specificity of 98% (95%CI 93-100). Other tools have been studied as: The Abbreviated Mental Test-10, the Abbreviated Mental Test short form, the Clock Drawing Test, the Cognitive Examination derived from the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Moreover, the use of a single question-namely, 'Does this patient have cognitive issues?' as answered by the multidisciplinary team-has been subjected to a validation process.
conclusionsTo date a few primary studies have been published to test the accuracy of tools in their ability to detect post-stroke delirium; among those available, the 4AT and the CAM-ICU tools have been mostly studied. Research has just started to add evidence to the challenge of detecting and usefully assessing newly-acquired delirium among stroke patients: therefore, more studies are needed to improve the knowledge and allow a robust selection of the most useful tool to use in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.