Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31791233›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Mapping of fire blight resistance in Malus ×robusta 5 flowers following artificial inoculation.

Andreas Peil, Christine Hübert, Annette Wensing, Mary Horner, Ofere Francis Emeriewen, Klaus Richter, Thomas Wöhner, David Chagné, Carolina Orellana-Torrejon, Munazza Saeed and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. QTL analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas PeilJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, 01326, Dresden, Germany. andreas.peil@julius-kuehn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-4441
Christine HübertJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Fruit Crops and Viticulture, Schwabenheimer str. 101, 69221, Dossenheim, Germany.
Annette WensingJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Fruit Crops and Viticulture, Schwabenheimer str. 101, 69221, Dossenheim, Germany.
Mary HornerThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited (PFR), Hawke's Bay Research Centre, Private Bag 1401, Havelock North, 4157, New Zealand.
Ofere Francis EmeriewenJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, 01326, Dresden, Germany.
Klaus RichterJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Thomas WöhnerJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, 01326, Dresden, Germany.
David ChagnéPFR, Palmerston North Research Centre, Private Bag 1600, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Carolina Orellana-TorrejonPFR, Palmerston North Research Centre, Private Bag 1600, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Munazza SaeedPFR, Palmerston North Research Centre, Private Bag 1600, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Michela TroggioResearch and Innovation Centre, Edmund Mach Foundation, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Erika StefaniResearch and Innovation Centre, Edmund Mach Foundation, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Susan E GardinerPFR, Palmerston North Research Centre, Private Bag 1600, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand.
Magda-Viola HankeJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, 01326, Dresden, Germany.
Henryk FlachowskyJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Pillnitzer Platz 3a, 01326, Dresden, Germany.
Vincent G M BusThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited (PFR), Hawke's Bay Research Centre, Private Bag 1401, Havelock North, 4157, New Zealand.
Julius Kühn-Institut · DEPalmerston North Hospital · NZFondazione Edmund Mach · ITPlant & Food Research · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the most common path of infection for fire blight, a severe bacterial disease on apple, is via host plant flowers, quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for fire blight resistance to date have exclusively been mapped following shoot inoculation. It is not known whether the same mechanism underlies flower and shoot resistance.

resultsWe report the detection of a fire blight resistance QTL following independent artificial inoculation of flowers and shoots on two F1 segregating populations derived from crossing resistant Malus ×robusta 5 (Mr5) with susceptible 'Idared' and 'Royal Gala' in experimental orchards in Germany and New Zealand, respectively. QTL mapping of phenotypic datasets from artificial flower inoculation of the 'Idared' × Mr5 population with Erwinia amylovora over several years, and of the 'Royal Gala' × Mr5 population in a single year, revealed a single major QTL controlling floral fire blight resistance on linkage group 3 (LG3) of Mr5. This QTL corresponds to the QTL on LG3 reported previously for the 'Idared' × Mr5 and an 'M9' × Mr5 population following shoot inoculation in the glasshouse. Interval mapping of phenotypic data from shoot inoculations of subsets from both flower resistance populations re-confirmed that the resistance QTL is in the same position on LG3 of Mr5 as that for flower inoculation. These results provide strong evidence that fire blight resistance in Mr5 is controlled by a major QTL on LG3, independently of the mode of infection, rootstock and environment.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates for the first time that resistance to fire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora is independent of the mode of inoculation at least in Malus ×robusta 5.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenetic LinkageDisease ResistanceErwinia amylovoraFlowersMalusPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociErwinia amylovoraFire blight resistanceMalus ×robusta 5Orchard inoculationQTL mapping

Identifiers

PMID31791233
PMCPMC6889339
OpenAlexW2990865390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.