Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31790978›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Nonhuman animal models of substance use disorders: Translational value and utility to basic science.

Mark A Smith

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Human laboratory models of reward in substance use disorder.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Behavioral effects of ethanol in the Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii).Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A SmithDepartment of Psychology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, 28035, United States. Electronic address: masmith@davidson.edu.
Davidson College · US

Funding

Social Influences on Drug-Seeking BehaviorR01DA031725 · NIDA · DAVIDSON COLLEGE · PI SMITH, MARK A · 2012 to 2022
$3.1M
The Influence of Gonadal Hormones on Opioid UseR01DA045364 · NIDA · DAVIDSON COLLEGE · PI SMITH, MARK A · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
Social Contact and MDMA UseR03DA045714 · NIDA · DAVIDSON COLLEGE · PI SMITH, MARK A · 2018 to 2019
$136k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031725NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045364NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA045714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) recently released a Request for Information (RFI) soliciting comments on nonhuman animal models of substance use disorders (SUD).

methodsA literature review was performed to address the four topics outlined in the RFI and one topic inspired by the RFI: (1) animal models that best recapitulate SUD, (2) animal models that best balance the trade-offs between resources and ecological validity, (3) animal models whose translational value are frequently misrepresented or overrepresented by the scientific community, (4) aspects of SUD that are not currently being modeled in animals, and (5) animal models that are optimal for examining the basic mechanisms by which drugs produce their abuse-related effects.

resultsModels that employ response-contingent drug administration, use complex schedules of reinforcement, measure behaviors that mimic the distinguishing features of SUD, and use animals that are phylogenetically similar to humans have the greatest translational value. Models that produce stable and reproducible baselines of behavior, lessen the number of uncontrolled variables, and minimize the influence of extraneous factors are best at examining basic mechanisms contributing to drug reward and reinforcement.

conclusionsNonhuman animal models of SUD have undergone significant refinements to increase their utility for basic science and translational value for SUD. The existing literature describes numerous examples of how these models may best be utilized to answer mechanistic questions of drug reward and identify potential therapeutic interventions for SUD. Progress in the field could be accelerated by further collaborations between researchers using animals versus humans.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalReinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsHumansNational Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.)RewardSpecies SpecificitySubstance-Related DisordersTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited StatesAddictionAnimalModelPreclinicalSubstance use disorderTranslational

Identifiers

PMID31790978
PMCPMC6980671
OpenAlexW2989764680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.