Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31790546›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2020

Effectiveness of a Brief Self-determination Theory-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smokers at Emergency Departments in Hong Kong: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

William Ho Cheung Li, Ka Yan Ho, Man Ping Wang, Derek Yee Tak Cheung, Katherine Ka Wai Lam, Wei Xia, Kai Yeung Cheung, Carlos King Ho Wong, Sophia Siu Chee Chan, Tai Hing Lam

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02660957 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Brief, Self-determination Intervention for Smoking Cessation (Immediate or Progressive) Among People Attending Emergency Departments: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2015 to 2018Enrolled1,571ConditionsSmokingArmsself-determination smoking cessation, placebo comparator
NCT05430529 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Development and a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Alcohol Intervention During Smoking Cessation Treatment Delivered by Healthcare Professionals

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsStandard Smoke Cessation Service, Short Advice for Control Group, Brief Alcohol Intervention for Intervention Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

William Ho Cheung LiSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ka Yan HoSchool of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Man Ping WangSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Derek Yee Tak CheungSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Katherine Ka Wai LamSchool of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Wei XiaSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kai Yeung CheungUnited Christian Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, China.
Carlos King Ho WongDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sophia Siu Chee ChanSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tai Hing LamSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clinicians have an opportunity to provide smoking cessation interventions to smokers who present to emergency departments (EDs). The effectiveness of a brief intervention based on self-determination theory for smoking cessation is uncertain. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a brief intervention based on self-determination theory for smoking cessation (immediate or progressive) among Chinese smokers presenting at EDs in Hong Kong. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-blind, multicenter intent-to-treat randomized clinical trial was conducted at the EDs of 4 major acute care hospitals in different districts of Hong Kong. In total, 1571 smokers 18 years or older who presented at 4 major EDs between July 4, 2015, and March 17, 2017, were randomized into an intervention group (n = 787) and a control group (n = 784). Interventions: The intervention group received brief advice (about 1 minute) and could choose their own quit schedules (immediate or progressive). The control group received a smoking cessation leaflet. Main Outcomes and Measures: Follow-up visits were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure, by intent to treat, was biochemically validated abstinence at 6 months. Results: Participants (N = 1571) included 1381 men (87.9%); the mean (SD) age at baseline was 47.4 (16.4) years. Among participants who self-reported abstinence at 6 months, 50.3% (85 of 169) had biochemical validation by both an exhaled carbon monoxide test and a saliva cotinine test. Compared with the control group, the intervention group had statistically higher biochemically validated abstinence at 6 months: 6.7% (53 of 787) vs 2.8% (22 of 784) (P < .001), with an adjusted relative risk of 3.21 (95% CI, 1.74-5.93; P < .001). The intervention group also had higher self-reported quit rates at 6 months (12.2% [96 of 787] vs 9.3% [73 of 784], P = .04) and 12 months (13.0% [102 of 787] vs 8.5% [67 of 784], P < .01), as well as higher biochemically validated abstinence at 12 months (7.0% [55 of 787] vs 3.7% [29 of 784], P < .001). The additional cost for each intervention group participant was US $0.47, with an estimated gain of 0.0238 quality-adjusted life-year. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (US $19.53) fell within acceptable thresholds. Conclusions and Relevance: This brief, low-cost self-determination theory-based intervention for smokers presenting at EDs effectively increased the biochemically validated quit rate at 6 months. If delivered routinely, such a simple intervention may offer a cost-effective and sustainable approach to help many smokers quit smoking. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02660957.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomyAdultBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideCigarette SmokingCost-Benefit AnalysisCotinineCounselingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedPamphletsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCarbon MonoxideCotinine

Identifiers

PMID31790546
PMCPMC6902195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.