Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31790390›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2019

Maternal prescribed opioid analgesic use during pregnancy and associations with adverse birth outcomes: A population-based study.

Ayesha C Sujan, Patrick D Quinn, Martin E Rickert, Kelsey K Wiggs, Paul Lichtenstein, Henrik Larsson, Catarina Almqvist, A Sara Öberg, Brian M D'Onofrio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Accuracy of diagnostic codes for prenatal opioid exposure and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayesha C SujanDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-9949
Patrick D QuinnDepartment of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6770-8762
Martin E RickertDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7010-7300
Kelsey K WiggsDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8013-7925
Paul LichtensteinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik LarssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Catarina AlmqvistDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1045-1898
A Sara ÖbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-1895
Brian M D'OnofrioDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5248-7434
Indiana University Bloomington · USKarolinska Institutet · SEHarvard University · USKarolinska University Hospital · SEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

Maternal use of prescribed opioid analgesics and risk of adverse offspring outcomesR01DA048042 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI D'ONOFRIO, BRIAN M, OBERG, ANNA SARA · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies of Prescription Opioid Analgesic RisksR00DA040727 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI QUINN, PATRICK DONOVAN · 2018 to 2020
$744k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA040727NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublished research on prescribed opioid analgesic (POA) use during pregnancy and birth outcomes is limited in scope and has not adequately adjusted for potential confounding factors. To help address these gaps, we estimated associations between maternal POAs during pregnancy and two adverse birth outcomes using a large population-based dataset, multiple definitions of POA exposure, and several methods to evaluate the influence of both measured and unmeasured confounding factors. METHODS AND

findingsWe obtained data by linking information from several Swedish registers and conducted a retrospective cohort study on a population-based sample of 620,458 Swedish births occurring between 2007 and 2013 (48.6% female; 44.4% firstborn). We evaluated associations between prenatal POA exposure and risk for preterm birth (PTB; <37 gestational weeks) and small for gestational age (SGA; birth weight 2 standard deviations below the expected weight for gestational age or lower). We evaluated the influence of confounding by adjusting for a wide range of measured covariates while comparing exposed and unexposed infants. Additionally, we adjusted for unmeasured confounding factors by using several advanced epidemiological designs. Infants exposed to POAs anytime during pregnancy were at increased risk for PTB compared with unexposed infants (6.4% exposed versus 4.4% unexposed; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.45, p < 0.001). This association was attenuated when we compared POA-exposed infants with acetaminophen-exposed infants (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.30, p < 0.001), infants born to women who used POAs before pregnancy only (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.14, p = 0.27), and unexposed siblings (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.14, p = 0.92). We also evaluated associations with short-term versus persistent POA use during pregnancy and observed a similar pattern of results, although the magnitudes of associations with persistent exposure were larger than associations with any use or short-term use. Although short-term use was not associated with SGA (adjusted ORsingle-trimester = 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.04, p = 0.29), persistent use was associated with increased risk for SGA (adjusted ORmultiple-trimester = 1.40, 95% CI 1.17-1.67, p < 0.001) compared with unexposed infants. The association with persistent exposure was attenuated when we used alternative comparison groups (e.g., sibling comparison OR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.60-2.48, p = 0.58). Of note, our study had limitations, including potential bias from exposure misclassification, an inability to adjust for all sources of confounding, and uncertainty regarding generalizability to countries outside of Sweden.

conclusionsOur results suggested that observed associations between POA use during pregnancy and risk of PTB and SGA were largely due to unmeasured confounding factors, although we could not rule out small independent associations, particularly for persistent POA use during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaleOpioid-Related DisordersParturitionPregnancyPremature BirthRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31790390
PMCPMC6886755
OpenAlexW2991396887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.