Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31790389›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

CDSeq: A novel complete deconvolution method for dissecting heterogeneous samples using gene expression data.

Kai Kang, Qian Meng, Igor Shats, David M Umbach, Melissa Li, Yuanyuan Li, Xiaoling Li, Leping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deep learning based deconvolution methods: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kai KangBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4348-3941
Qian MengBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Igor ShatsSignal Transduction Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
David M UmbachBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-2812
Melissa LiBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-0092
Yuanyuan LiBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-5664
Xiaoling LiSignal Transduction Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Leping LiBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-0259

Funding

BioinformaticsZ01ES101765 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LI, LEPING · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES101765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying cell-type proportions and their corresponding gene expression profiles in tissue samples would enhance understanding of the contributions of individual cell types to the physiological states of the tissue. Current approaches that address tissue heterogeneity have drawbacks. Experimental techniques, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and single cell RNA sequencing are expensive. Computational approaches that use expression data from heterogeneous samples are promising, but most of the current methods estimate either cell-type proportions or cell-type-specific expression profiles by requiring the other as input. Although such partial deconvolution methods have been successfully applied to tumor samples, the additional input required may be unavailable. We introduce a novel complete deconvolution method, CDSeq, that uses only RNA-Seq data from bulk tissue samples to simultaneously estimate both cell-type proportions and cell-type-specific expression profiles. Using several synthetic and real experimental datasets with known cell-type composition and cell-type-specific expression profiles, we compared CDSeq's complete deconvolution performance with seven other established deconvolution methods. Complete deconvolution using CDSeq represents a substantial technical advance over partial deconvolution approaches and will be useful for studying cell mixtures in tissue samples. CDSeq is available at GitHub repository (MATLAB and Octave code): https://github.com/kkang7/CDSeq.

Indexed as

Unsupervised Machine LearningCell LineComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression ProfilingHumansLeukocytesPattern Recognition, AutomatedSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31790389
PMCPMC6907860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.