ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2020
Challenges and solutions to the study of rare childhood tumors.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Landscape of US and Global Rare Tumor Research Programs: A Systematic Review.The oncologist · 2024Pooled it
- Epidemiology of Childhood Cancer and Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs): A 20-Year Single-Center Cohort from the Greater Poland Region.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Natural History Study of Children and Adults with Rare Solid Tumors: Initial Results for First 200 Participants.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- Article
- The Childhood Cancer Data Initiative: Using the Power of Data to Learn From and Improve Outcomes for Every Child and Young Adult With Pediatric Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- NCI intramural program approach to rare tumors: Natural history study of rare solid tumors in children and adults: A longitudinal, comprehensive data and biospecimen collection protocol.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2023Article
- FOXO3a inhibits nephroblastoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induces apoptosis through downregulating the Wnt/β‑catenin signaling pathway.Molecular medicine reports · 2021Article
- Emerging Role and Mechanism of circRNAs in Pediatric Malignant Solid Tumors.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe majority of progress made in pediatric oncology over the past 50 years has been achieved in the most common cancers. Rare pediatric cancers, which collectively comprise more than 10% of all pediatric cancers, pose multiple challenges to researchers and clinicians, all which stem from the infrequency of these cancers. There has been a tremendous increase in focus on rare pediatric cancers by international consortia and registries, disease-specific clinics, and divisions of academic children's hospitals in the last 10 years. This focus, along with the progress made in cancer genomics, has changed the landscape for the study and treatment of rare pediatric cancers. This review focuses on the past, present, and future of the study and treatment of rare pediatric cancers. RECENT
findingsCancer genomics is changing the way some cancers are being diagnosed, categorized, and treated. Rare pediatric cancers potentially stand to greatly benefit from advances in precision diagnosis and treatment. SUMMARY: The challenges of studying rare pediatric cancers are well known. By utilizing similar techniques that allowed for progress in the common pediatric malignancies, namely collaboration, increased focus, greater funding, and utilization of cancer genomics, progress in the study and treatment of rare pediatric cancers is promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.