Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31789823›Full record

ArticleA&A practice2020

Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection of an Entrapped Saphenous Nerve After Lower Extremity Varicose Vein Stripping: A Case Report.

Kunitaro Watanabe, Joho Tokumine, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Kumi Moriyama, Tomoko Yorozu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in A&A practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adductor canal syndrome after lesser trochanter avulsion fracture in a 19-year-old.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kunitaro WatanabeFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Joho TokumineFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Alan Kawarai LeforDepartment of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Kumi MoriyamaFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko YorozuFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 78-year-old woman complained of numbness, tingling, and pain in the left leg 6 months after greater saphenous vein stripping. Ultrasonography identified a mass adjacent to the saphenous nerve at the scar. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection separated the mass from the nerve. The pain disappeared after hydrodissection, and the patient remained pain free for 3 days. The visual analog pain scale decreased from 80 (before treatment) to 60 three days later. The hydrodissection was repeated weekly for a total of 8 times, and the pain completely resolved 4 months later. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection is effective to treat nerve entrapment after lower extremity varicose vein stripping.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansLower ExtremityPain MeasurementPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalVaricose VeinsVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID31789823
PMCPMC6948788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.