Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31789795›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2020

Anatomical and Functional Consequences of Microneedle Perforation of Round Window Membrane.

Michelle Yu, Daniel N Arteaga, Aykut Aksit, Harry Chiang, Elizabeth S Olson, Jeffrey W Kysar, Anil K Lalwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pyrolyzed Ultrasharp Glassy Carbon Microneedles.Advanced engineering materials · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Development of novel drug carrier via round window membrane].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Microtechnologies for inner ear drug delivery.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2020
    Review
  18. Inner ear delivery: Challenges and opportunities.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020
    Review
  19. Inner Ear Gene Delivery: Vectors and Routes.Hearing, balance and communication · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle YuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Daniel N ArteagaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Aykut AksitDepartment of Mechanical Engineering.
Harry ChiangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Elizabeth S OlsonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Jeffrey W KysarDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Anil K LalwaniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment ProgramP30CA013696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Anil K Rustgi · 1985 to 2026
$115.3M
Intracochlear Delivery of Therapeutics Across RWM via Microneedle ArrayR01DC014547 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KYSAR, JEFFREY W., LALWANI, ANIL K · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
MULTIPHOTON CONFOCAL MICROSCOPES10RR025686 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PON, LIZA A · 2010 to 2010
$499k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013696NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025686NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisMicroneedles can create microperforations in the round window membrane (RWM) without causing anatomic or physiologic damage.

backgroundReliable delivery of agents into the inner ear for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes remains a challenge. Our novel approach employs microneedles to facilitate intracochlear access via the RWM. This study investigates the anatomical and functional consequences of microneedle perforations in guinea pig RWMs in vivo.

methodsSingle three-dimensional-printed, 100 μm diameter microneedles were used to perforate the guinea pig RWM via the postauricular sulcus. Hearing was assessed both before and after microneedle perforation using compound action potential and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Confocal microscopy was used ex vivo to examine harvested RWMs, measuring the size, shape, and location of perforations and documenting healing at 0 hours (n = 7), 24 hours (n = 6), 48 hours (n = 6), and 1 week (n = 6).

resultsMicroneedles create precise and accurate perforations measuring 93.1 ± 29.0 μm by 34.5 ± 16.8 μm and produce a high-frequency threshold shift that disappears after 24 hours. Examination of perforations over time demonstrates healing progression over 24 to 48 hours and complete perforation closure by 1 week.

conclusionMicroneedles can create a temporary microperforation in the RWM without causing significant anatomic or physiologic dysfunction. Microneedles have the potential to mediate safe and effective intracochlear access for diagnosis and treatment of inner ear disease.

Indexed as

Ear, InnerRound Window, EarAnimalsGuinea PigsHearingNeedles

Identifiers

PMID31789795
PMCPMC8462276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.