ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
Attaining Intraocular Pressure of ≤10 mm Hg: Comparison of Tube and Trabeculectomy Surgery in Pseudophakic Primary Glaucoma Eyes.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of reducing intraocular pressure to single-digit levels in Normal-tension glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of tube shunt implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Failed Ahmed glaucoma valves: trabeculectomy versus repeat shunt surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Contributing factors for intraocular pressure control in patients with mostly normal-tension glaucoma after initial Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Trabeculectomy: Does It Have a Future?Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate whether trabeculectomy with antimetabolites or glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery is more likely to achieve an intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤10 mm Hg.
designRetrospective, nonrandomized, cohort study of pseudophakic, primary glaucoma patients.
methods53 pseudophakic patients underwent trabeculectomy and 65 received GDD at the University of Florida by one surgeon between 1993 and 2015. The main outcome measures were mean IOP and percentage of patients obtaining an IOP ≤10 mm Hg for up to 5 years postoperatively. A subgroup undergoing a first time glaucoma surgery was also analyzed because there were more redo glaucoma procedures in the GDD group.
resultsOver 5 years, the mean annual IOP for the trabeculectomy eyes was between 6.9 and 7.8 mm Hg on an average of 0.2 medications, and that for GDD eyes was between 11.4 and 12.1 mm Hg on a mean of 1.6 to 1.9 medications (P < 0.002). A significantly higher percentage of trabeculectomy eyes than GDD eyes achieved a pressure of ≤10 mm Hg, for years 1 to 4 (P < 0.05). Visual acuity (VA) change was not statistically different between the groups, both for mean logMAR acuity and percentage of patients that lost ≥2 Snellen lines. Complication rates were similar between the groups. Postoperative VA change was similar for eyes achieving low IOP ≤5 mm Hg and those eyes with an IOP ≥10 mm Hg.
conclusionsTrabeculectomy provided significantly lower IOP for 5 years postoperatively in pseudophakic primary glaucoma patients, and was more likely to achieve an IOP ≤10 mm Hg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.