Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31789599›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Use of Mobile Health Apps and Wearable Technology to Assess Changes and Predict Pain During Treatment of Acute Pain in Sickle Cell Disease: Feasibility Study.

Amanda Johnson, Fan Yang, Siddharth Gollarahalli, Tanvi Banerjee, Daniel Abrams, Jude Jonassaint, Charles Jonassaint, Nirmish Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mathematical modeling of SCD: a literature review.Journal of sickle cell disease · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Consumer Wearables for Patient Monitoring in Otolaryngology: A State of the Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Johnson *Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9333-9692
Fan Yang *Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7550-0662
Siddharth GollarahalliNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-8566
Tanvi BanerjeeDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-3755
Daniel AbramsEngineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-8358
Jude JonassaintSocial Work and Clinical and Translational Science, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5103-5594
Charles JonassaintSocial Work and Clinical and Translational Science, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5662-5806
Nirmish ShahDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7506-0935
Duke University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWright State University · USNorth Carolina State University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

SCH: INT: Collaborative Research: Development and analysis of new mathematical and statistical models for chronic painR01AT010413 · NCCIH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ABRAMS, DANIEL M, BANERJEE, TANVI · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited red blood cell disorder affecting millions worldwide, and it results in many potential medical complications throughout the life course. The hallmark of SCD is pain. Many patients experience daily chronic pain as well as intermittent, unpredictable acute vaso-occlusive painful episodes called pain crises. These pain crises often require acute medical care through the day hospital or emergency department. Following presentation, a number of these patients are subsequently admitted with continued efforts of treatment focused on palliative pain control and hydration for management. Mitigating pain crises is challenging for both the patients and their providers, given the perceived unpredictability and subjective nature of pain.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to show the feasibility of using objective, physiologic measurements obtained from a wearable device during an acute pain crisis to predict patient-reported pain scores (in an app and to nursing staff) using machine learning techniques.

methodsFor this feasibility study, we enrolled 27 adult patients presenting to the day hospital with acute pain. At the beginning of pain treatment, each participant was given a wearable device (Microsoft Band 2) that collected physiologic measurements. Pain scores from our mobile app, Technology Resources to Understand Pain Assessment in Patients with Pain, and those obtained by nursing staff were both used with wearable signals to complete time stamp matching and feature extraction and selection. Following this, we constructed regression and classification machine learning algorithms to build between-subject pain prediction models.

resultsPatients were monitored for an average of 3.79 (SD 2.23) hours, with an average of 5826 (SD 2667) objective data values per patient. As expected, we found that pain scores and heart rate decreased for most patients during the course of their stay. Using the wearable sensor data and pain scores, we were able to create a regression model to predict subjective pain scores with a root mean square error of 1.430 and correlation between observations and predictions of 0.706. Furthermore, we verified the hypothesis that the regression model outperformed the classification model by comparing the performances of the support vector machines (SVM) and the SVM for regression.

conclusionsThe Microsoft Band 2 allowed easy collection of objective, physiologic markers during an acute pain crisis in adults with SCD. Features can be extracted from these data signals and matched with pain scores. Machine learning models can then use these features to feasibly predict patient pain scores.

Indexed as

Acute PainAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnemia, Sickle CellEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart RateHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsNursing StaffPain ManagementAnalgesics, Opioidmachine learningpainSCDsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID31789599
PMCPMC6915456
OpenAlexW2964116189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.