ArticleJournal of nursing management2020
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load (MDT-CL).
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment and Factors Associated With Cognitive Load in Orthopaedic Nurses During Bedside Handover: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Influence factors of guideline adherence based on the Cognitive Load Theory among clinical nurses: A cross-sectional study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- AI-driven adaptive training for utility employees: a three-wave cluster-randomized field experiment on cognitive-load and personalization-fit pathways.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Mediator Effects of Cognitive Load on Association between Self-Efficacy and Task Load in Intensive Care Unit Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Article
- Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load (MDT-CL).Journal of nursing management · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo translate the instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load (MDT-CL) into Chinese and assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the MDT-CL.
backgroundThe MDT-CL is needed for hospital administrators to identify which nursing staff are prone to high cognitive load and to provide tailored interventions for specific types of cognitive load.
methodsThe MDT-CL was translated into Chinese using forward and back translation, cultural adaptation and pilot tested. The reliability and validity of the instrument were assessed with intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in three tertiary hospitals in China.
resultsA total of 222 ICU nurses were recruited. The scale-content validity index of the Chinese version of the MDT-CL was 0.966. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that all the goodness-of-fit indicators were acceptable. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.818. Test-retest reliability was 0.785.
conclusionsThe Chinese version of the MDT-CL is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the cognitive load of ICU nurses in China. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The validated Chinese version of the MDT-CL is a feasible, quantitative tool for evaluating different types of cognitive load in busy clinical practice, suggesting significant clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.