Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31789409›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2020

Expression profile of Toll‑like receptors in human breast cancer.

Shuxun Shi, Cong Xu, Xiaonan Fang, Yonghuan Zhang, Hua Li, Wujun Wen, Guiwen Yang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuxun Shi *Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Cong Xu *Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Xiaonan FangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Yonghuan ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Hua LiShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Wujun WenShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Guiwen YangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China.
Shandong Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toll‑like receptors (TLRs) are the most widely studied pattern recognition receptors. Mounting evidence suggests an important association between TLRs and the occurrence and development of breast cancer. Thus, targeting these receptors may be a potential strategy for breast cancer treatment. The current study analyzed the data of 1,215 patients with breast cancer obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. It was observed that, in addition to TLR6, TLR7 and TLR8, the expression of the remaining TLRs in breast cancer tissues was lower than that in normal tissues. In addition, TLR3 and TLR9 displayed significantly different expression levels in ER‑/PR‑negative breast cancer compared with the control tissues, while TLR5 expression was significantly reduced in HER2‑enriched breast cancer. Furthermore, TLR10 exhibited lower expression levels in advanced stages of the disease as compared with that observed in earlier stages. Survival analysis revealed that the expression of TLR4 and TLR7 had a significant impact on survival, and higher expression levels suggested worse prognosis. Finally, the expression levels of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6 and TLR10 were correlated with those of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin‑1β and tumor necrosis factor‑α, while the expression levels of TLR3, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9 were correlated with those of interferon‑β and C‑X‑C motif chemokine ligand 10. Taken together, the current study results suggest that TLR expression may serve as a biomarker of cancer pathogenesis and progression, and may provide new insights for the treatment of breast cancer through the regulation and targeting of TLRs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCytokinesDatabases, GeneticDisease ProgressionErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedToll-Like Receptor 1Toll-Like Receptor 10Toll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 3Toll-Like Receptor 4Toll-Like Receptor 5Toll-Like Receptor 6Toll-Like Receptor 7CytokinesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTLR10 protein, humanTLR1 protein, humanTLR2 protein, humanTLR3 protein, humanTLR4 protein, humanTLR5 protein, humanTLR6 protein, humanTLR7 protein, humanTLR8 protein, humanTLR9 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 1Toll-Like Receptor 10Toll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 3Toll-Like Receptor 4Toll-Like Receptor 5Toll-Like Receptor 6Toll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8Toll-Like Receptor 9Toll-Like Receptorsbreast cancerinflammatory cytokinessurvivalthe cancer genome atlasToll-like receptors

Identifiers

PMID31789409
PMCPMC6947885
OpenAlexW2989820968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.