Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31789354›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2019

Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: A systematic overview of systematic reviews.

Laura J Anderson, Jeff L Schnipper, Teryl K Nuckols, Rita Shane, Michael M Le, Karen Robbins, Joshua M Pevnick, Members of the PHARM-DC group

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development of a Discharge Counseling and Medication Reconciliation Process for Pediatric Patients Within a Large, Academic Health System.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  14. Medication reconciliationEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Tools and tactics for postdischarge medication management interventions.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura J AndersonDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Jeff L SchnipperDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Teryl K NuckolsDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Rita ShaneDepartment of Pharmacy, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Michael M LeDavid Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Karen RobbinsDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Joshua M PevnickDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Members of the PHARM-DC group
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity College Cork · IEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Mitigating Benzodiazepine and Sedative Use in the Hospital through Inpatient DeprescribingR01AG058911 · NIA · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEVNICK, JOSHUA M · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Minimizing Errors in Medication Histories Obtained at Hospital AdmissionK23AG049181 · NIA · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEVNICK, JOSHUA M · 2015 to 2018
$707k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG049181NIA NIH HHS L30 AG048588NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate and summarize published evidence from systematic reviews examining medication reconciliation.

methodsMEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for English-language systematic reviews published from January 2004 to March 2019. Reviewers independently extracted information and scored review quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. For reviews with AMSTAR scores above 7, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess evidence quality, with evidence summarized and conclusions compared across reviews.

resultsEleven reviews met the inclusion criteria, 5 of which used meta-analytic pooling. Most systematic reviews included primary studies of comprehensive bundled interventions that featured medication reconciliation as a central component. Reviews largely focused on transitions into and out of hospital settings. Five reviews focused exclusively on pharmacist-led interventions. Of the 5 reviews that considered all types of medication discrepancies, 3 reviews found very low-quality evidence that interventions reduced medication discrepancies. Neither of the 2 reviews that examined clinically significant medication discrepancies found any intervention effect. Of the 5 reviews that examined healthcare utilization outcomes, only 1 found any intervention effect, and that finding was based on low- to very low-quality evidence. Four reviews considered clinical outcomes, but none found any intervention effect.

conclusionAn overview of systematic reviews of medication reconciliation interventions found 9 high-quality systematic reviews. A minority of those reviews' conclusions were consistent with medication reconciliation alone having a measurable impact, and such conclusions were almost all based on very low-quality evidence.

Indexed as

PharmacistsSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansMedication ReconciliationTreatment Outcomeinterventionmedication errorsmedication reconciliationmedication reviewreviewsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31789354
PMCPMC6885740
OpenAlexW2993315964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.