Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31789300›Full record

SynthesisJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2019

The effectiveness of McKenzie method compared to manual therapy for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Fayez Ibrahim Namnaqani, Abdulrhman Salah Mashabi, Khalid Mohammed Yaseen, Mansour Abdullah Alshehri

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07285824 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Virtual McKenzie Exercises and Centralization of Pain: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEvidence In MotionRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsChronic Pain, Low Back PainArmsMotor Imagery-Based Lumbar Extension
NCT07403292 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of McGill and McKenzie Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled57ConditionsChronic Mechanical Low Back PainArmsMcGill Exercises, McKenzie Exercises, Standardized Physiotherapy Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Chiropractic management of L5-S1 disc protrusion in an elite speed skater: a case report.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2025
    Article
  15. 14. Discogenic Low Back Pain.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Lower Back Pain Associated with Spinal Stenosis: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fayez Ibrahim NamnaqaniPhysical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrhman Salah MashabiPhysical Therapy Department, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Mohammed YaseenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour Abdullah AlshehriPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Taibah University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the McKenzie method compared to manual therapy in the management of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Randomised controlled trials evaluating the McKenzie method in treating CLBP in adults compared to manual therapy (MT) were searched in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro. The primary outcomes were pain and disability. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in the review, of which, most had a score of 8 out of 11 on the PEDro scale. At 2-3 months, all studies reported significant improvement in the pain level in the McKenzie group, and more than that in the MT group. At 6 months, significant improvements had occurred in the disability index reported by two trials in the McKenzie group than the MT group. At 12 months follow-up, there were no significant differences in measures of LBP, but three studies reported that the McKenzie method group had a better disability level than the MT group. In patients with CLBP, many pain measures showed that the McKenzie method is a successful treatment to decrease pain in the short term, while the disability measures determined that the McKenzie method is better in enhancing function in the long term.

Indexed as

Chronic PainExercise TherapyHumansLow Back PainMusculoskeletal ManipulationsTreatment OutcomeChronic Low Back PainDisabilityManual TherapyMckenzie TreatmentPhysical Therapy

Identifiers

PMID31789300
PMCPMC6944795
OpenAlexW2997603128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.