Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788947›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2020

Bioresponsive microspheres for on-demand delivery of anti-inflammatory cytokines for articular cartilage repair.

Eunjae Park, Melanie L Hart, Bernd Rolauffs, Jan P Stegemann, Ramkumar T Annamalai

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cartilage · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eunjae ParkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Melanie L HartCenter for Tissue Replacement, Regeneration and Neogenesis, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center-Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Bernd RolauffsCenter for Tissue Replacement, Regeneration and Neogenesis, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center-Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan P StegemannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ramkumar T AnnamalaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9880-3973
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Microscale Mechanobiology for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering using Advanced Ultrasound TechniquesR01DE026630 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DENG, CHERI X, STEGEMANN, JAN P. · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Bone Regeneration Using Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Tissue ModulesR01AR062636 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEGEMANN, JAN P. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062636NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite innovations in surgical interventions, treatment of cartilage injury in osteoarthritic joints remains a challenge due to concomitant inflammation. Obstructing a single dominant inflammatory cytokine has shown remarkable clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis, and similar strategies are being suggested to target inflammatory pathways in osteoarthritis (OA). Here, we describe the utility of gelatin microspheres that are responsive to proteolytic enzymes typically expressed in arthritic flares, resulting in on-demand and spatiotemporally controlled release of anti-inflammatory cytokines for cartilage preservation and repair. These microspheres were designed with a net negative charge to sequester cationic anti-inflammatory cytokines, and the magnitude of the negative charge potential increased with an increase in crosslinking density. Collagenase-mediated degradation of the microspheres was dependent on the concentration of the enzyme. Release of anti-inflammatory cytokines from the loaded microspheres directly correlated with the degradation of the gelatin matrix. Exposure of the IL-4 and IL-13 loaded microspheres reduced the inflammation of chondrocytes up to 80%. Hence, the delivery of these microspheres in an OA joint can attenuate the stimulation of chondrocytes and the resulting secretion of catabolic factors such as proteinases and nitric oxide. The microsphere format also allows for minimally invasive delivery and is less susceptible to mechanically induced drug release. Consequently, bioresponsive microspheres can be an effective tool for cartilage preservation and arthritis treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsCell LineCytokinesDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug LiberationGelatinHumansMiceOsteoarthritisAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsCytokinesDelayed-Action PreparationsGelatinchondrocytescontrolled drug releaseIL-10IL-13IL-4inflammationosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID31788947
PMCPMC6995991
OpenAlexW2994243494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.