Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788809›Full record

ArticleBioethics2020

Abortion is incommensurable with fetal alcohol syndrome.

Claire Pickard

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The SIA Can't Just Go with the FLO.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024
    Article
  2. A reply to Gillham on the impairment principle.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024
    Article
  3. Three Problems with the Impairment Argument.Asian bioethics review · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire PickardDepartment of Philosophy, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-0901-6386
University of Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent article argued for the immorality of abortion regardless of personhood status by comparing the impairment caused by fetal alcohol syndrome to the impairment caused by abortion. I argue that two of the premises in this argument fail and that, as such, one cannot reasonably attribute moral harms to abortion on the basis of the moral harms caused by fetal alcohol syndrome. The impairment argument relies on an inconsistent instantiation, which undermines the claim that personhood is irrelevant, and it does not fulfill its own ceteris paribus clause, which demands that no additional benefit be gained from abortion that would not be gained from causing fetal alcohol syndrome.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersFemaleFetusHumansPersonhoodPregnancyValue of Lifeabortionconsequentialismimpairment argumentpersonhoodpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31788809
OpenAlexW2993828792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.