Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788769›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

Comparison of Different Nisin Separation and Concentration Methods: Industrial and Cost-Effective Perspectives.

Say-Yed Hesameddin Tafreshi, Saeed Mirdamadi, Shohreh Khatami

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Say-Yed Hesameddin TafreshiVaccine R&D Unit, Research and Production Complex, Pasteur Institute of Iran, 25th km Tehran-Karaj Highway, Alborz, 3159915111, Iran.
Saeed MirdamadiBiotechnology Department, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Sh. Ehsani Rad St., Enqelab St., Parsa Sq., Ahmadabad Mostoufi Rd., Azadegan Highway, Tehran, 3313193685, Iran. mirdamadi@irost.ir.
Shohreh KhatamiBiochemistry Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Karegar Ave., Pasteur St., Ordibehesht St., No. 69, Tehran, 1316943551, Iran.
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRIranian Research Organization for Science and Technology · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Separation and concentration of biotechnological products are the most important steps of purification stage in downstream processing. In the present study, three nisin separation and concentration methods including salting out by ammonium sulfate, solvent extraction (at 20 °C, 4 °C, and - 10 °C) and direct chromatography of culture medium were compared with each other. According to our results, nisin precipitation by ammonium sulfate at 40% saturation was the most efficient method (yield = 90.04%, purification fold = 168.80). Low yield and fold purification values were obtained by solvent extraction with chloroform (yield = 24.23%, fold purification = 37.43 at - 10 °C) and direct cation exchange chromatography of culture medium (yield = 20.00%, fold purification = 1.80). Also, performing purification steps in low pH values and acidic conditions (pH = 3.0) is essential for efficient nisin purification.

Indexed as

Ammonium SulfateChromatographyLactococcus lactisNisinAmmonium SulfateNisinConcentrationIsolationNisinPrecipitationPurification

Identifiers

PMID31788769
OpenAlexW2990226643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.