Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788767›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

Use of Fecal Slurry Cultures to Study In Vitro Effects of Bacteriocins on the Gut Bacterial Populations of Infants.

Özgün C O Umu, Miguel Gueimonde, Marije Oostindjer, Kirill V Ovchinnikov, Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán, Sara Arbulu, Pablo E Hernández, Beatriz Martínez, Dzung B Diep, Nuria Salazar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Özgün C O UmuFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway. ozgun.umu@nmbu.no.
Miguel GueimondeDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPLA-CSIC), Villaviciosa, Spain.
Marije OostindjerFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway.
Kirill V OvchinnikovFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway.
Clara G de Los Reyes-GavilánDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPLA-CSIC), Villaviciosa, Spain.
Sara ArbuluSección Departamental de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos (Nutrición, Bromatología, Higiene y Seguridad Alimentaria), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Pablo E HernándezSección Departamental de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos (Nutrición, Bromatología, Higiene y Seguridad Alimentaria), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz MartínezDepartment of Technology and Biotechnology of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPLA-CSIC), Villaviciosa, Spain.
Dzung B DiepFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway.
Nuria SalazarDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPLA-CSIC), Villaviciosa, Spain.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias · ESInstituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides produced by bacteria to compete with other bacteria for nutrients and ecological niches. The antimicrobial effect of these peptides on the bacterial populations in the gut is likely dynamic as the survival of the microbes in this environment depends on both competition and cooperation. In this study, we evaluated four different bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB): nisin, enterocin A (EntA), enterocin K1 (EntK1), and garvicin ML (GarML), which have different inhibition spectra and physicochemical properties. The bacteriocins were tested in vitro using fecal slurry batch cultures from infants. The abundances of some bacterial populations in the cultures were determined using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota was assessed by measuring the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) using gas chromatography. The effects of the bacteriocins correlated well with their antimicrobial spectra and the administered concentrations. Nisin and GarML, with broad antimicrobial spectra, shifted the abundance of several intestinal bacterial groups, while EntA and EntK1, with relative narrower inhibition spectra, showed no or little effect. Moreover, the results from the SCFA analysis were consistent with changes obtained in the bacterial composition. In particular, a reduction in acetate concentration was observed in the samples with low abundance of Bifidobacterium, which is a well-known acetate producer. The variability imposed on the intestinal bacterial populations by the different bacteriocins tested suggests that this type of antimicrobials have great potential to modulate the gut microbiota for medical purposes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriocinsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfant, NewbornLactobacillalesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriocinsBacteriocinsEnterocin AEnterocin K1Garvicin MLGut bacteriaNisin

Identifiers

PMID31788767
OpenAlexW2990108630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.