Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31788740›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Effectiveness of intracavitary electrocardiogram-guided peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement in premature infants: a multicentre pre-post intervention study.

Ai-Qing Xiao, Jing Sun, Li-Hui Zhu, Zhen-Yu Liao, Ping Shen, Lin-Lin Zhao, Jos M Latour

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Operation and management guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates (2021)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ai-Qing XiaoDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Jing SunNursing school, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Li-Hui ZhuNursing Department, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China. 877845375@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-2512
Zhen-Yu LiaoDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Ping ShenDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Lin-Lin ZhaoDivision of Neonatal Medicine, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, Hunan Province, China.
Jos M LatourNursing Department, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Hunan Children's Hospital · CNHunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNXiangyang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Education Department of Hunan Province CX2018B510Health Commission of Hunan province C2019015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pre-post intervention study was conducted in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in two Chinese hospitals. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG)-guided peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement and tip positioning in premature infants. A total of 161 premature infants who required a PICC were enrolled and divided into two groups: pre-intervention group (n = 83) from October 2017 to July 2018 and post-intervention IC-ECG group (n = 78) from August 2018 to March 2019. Nurses were trained from May 2018 to July 2018. The reposition rate in the IC-ECG group and pre-interventions group was 3.85% and 19.28%, respectively (OR 5.970; 95% CI 1.666-21.395; p = 0.002). More infants achieved optimal tip position at the first attempt in the IC-ECG group than the pre-intervention group (93.59% vs 73.49%; OR 0.190; 95%CI 0.068-0.531; p = 0.001). The overall catheter-related complications in the pre-intervention group were 14.46% compared to 3.84% in the IC-ECG group (OR 2.962; 95%CI 1.013-8.661; p = 0.040). However, no significant differences were observed between the individual complication leakage, phlebitis and catheter-related blood stream infection.Conclusions: IC-ECG-guided peripherally inserted central catheter placement and tip positioning technology might decrease reposition rates, achieve more accurate tip positioning at the first attempt and might reduce catheter-related complications in premature infants. Further robust RCTs are needed to confirm the effectiveness of IC-ECG-guided PICC placement and tip positioning in neonates.What is Known:• Chest radiography is the gold standard for tip position confirmation of peripherally inserted central catheter placement.• Studies in adult patients have shown that electrocardiogram guidance in the placement of central venous catheters can be beneficial, while evidence in neonates is limited.What is New:• Intracavitary electrocardiogram-guided peripherally inserted central catheter placement might be superior to chest radiography in preterm infants.• Decreasing the repositioning rates and correct tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters might reduce catheter-related complications.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersControlled Before-After StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleChest radiographyElectrocardiogramPeripherally inserted central catheterPreterm infantsTip positioning

Identifiers

PMID31788740
OpenAlexW2991420367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.