ArticleVeterinary research communications2020
An in vitro study of the effect of the optimal irrigation solution conditions during canine articular surgery.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish whether chondrocyte viability, matrix degradation and the induction of proteolytic gene expression in canine cartilage is independent of irrigation fluid osmolality and time following exposure to the irrigation fluid.
methodsCanine cartilage explants were exposed to one of three different solution types i) Culture medium (270-280 mOsmol/kg) ii) NaCl 0.9% (302 mOsmol/kg) iii) NaCl 0.9% with sucrose (600 mOsmol/kg). Chondrocyte viability and selected proteolytic gene expression were measured at two time points; immediately following exposure and 24 h following exposure. The media samples at 24 h following exposure were assessed for sulphated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) release.
resultsIn all samples, no cell death was observed across the superficial or deeper layers of the cartilage. When adjusting for time, gene expression was not shown to be dependent on solution type. However for all solution types, Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) and A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with Thrombospondin Motifs 5 (ADAMTS5) expression was significantly decreased in cartilage samples at 24 h post exposure comparatively to samples tested immediately post exposure. No significant differences were identified in the relative sGAG release between the solution types. CLINICAL SIGNIFCANCE: Arthroscopic solution irrigation of cartilage explants had no effect on cell viability or proteinase production. At present there is no indication to optimise irrigation fluid osmolarity, as conventional arthroscopic solution was not deleterious to healthy cartilage in this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.